Yours. Mine. Theirs.
Is it right or is it wrong? Who gets to decide?
The principle of ahimsa says 'the path of the least harm'. In principle. Not always that obvious.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yours. Mine. Theirs.
Is it right or is it wrong? Who gets to decide?
Good is complex.
Is there truly a right or a wrong?
I know the Messengers of God were right. They are all Truth.
But you didn't answer the question
It maybe a human construct but good is no less complex. So is it harmful to take one innocent life against their will to save hundreds of other innocent lives? I would say yes, but it would be the lesser of two evils.In my view, it's a human construct.
It was answered.
It maybe a human construct but good is no less complex. So is it harmful to take one innocent life against their will to save hundreds of other innocent lives? I would say yes, but it would be the lesser of two evils.
Oh no death is right., if ya stop breathing cuz your were distracted and drove over a cliff ya deserve it! Two types of breathing actually. Need a new word.So death is wrong? Then clearly, we've made some mistakes.
Some might not see it that way. And again, evil, in my view, is merely a human construct. There is no universal or objective "good" or "evil."
Good and evil are human constructs, they are words. Just because the map is a human construct doesn't mean the territory doesn't exist.Some might not see it that way. And again, evil, in my view, is merely a human construct. There is no universal or objective "good" or "evil."
No, it wasn't. You took the question in the OP and applied your own spin...your own perspective...your own personal truth. You, in no way, gave any example that you are right.
And some people (like me for example) might very well find "what they offer" to be a load of old cobblers. So now who's "right" and who's "wrong"? Wait - I know - I'm wrong, right?What they offer is testable and justice requires us to undertake those required tests.
Some might not see it that way. And again, evil, in my view, is merely a human construct. There is no universal or objective "good" or "evil."
Consider religion, politics, philosophy, morals, ethics, or whatever. How do you know you are right and another is wrong?
Is there truly a right or a wrong? Or are right and wrong merely human constructs to assert perspective?
Thoughts?
So the Golden Rule is right and pure? It's mankind's objective principle?
And some people (like me for example) might very well find "what they offer" to be a load of old cobblers. So now who's "right" and who's "wrong"? Wait - I know - I'm wrong, right?
Well of course I knew that all along - and I was right!Yes, plain and simple, you are wrong.
That which produces love is right. That which runs contrary to love is wrong. The goal of all virtues is love. Love is peace. Life runs on love.
Love for others, love for self. Self must be equal to the selfless motives.
Well of course I knew that all along - and I was right!