These ones must have missed the quote
It is only for our benefit Mike, yes there is no gender for the source of intelligence.
All we can know of that source is via the method that intelligence has chosen to speak with us and that to date has been Messengers. This all that we can know is given by that Message.
As to why we have Male and Females, it might be a bit like a magnetic attraction, that is, opposites attract.
There is just some things above our pay grade Mike.
This is also based in logic. Think about us as a species and our ability to bring things from the unknown to the known.
No matter how hard we try, we can not create life, the formula is not ours to know.
Can the craft know the craftsman, can the painting know the painter?
Logically we have to realise we are not all knowing.
Regards Tony
I'm also curious on this entities preference for masculine pronouns. Does the entity even have a gender as we do? Of course there could be more than one entity. Some people think so. If it is intuitively obvious that all this (we and the cosmos) require a creating entity, why only one? It would seem equally plausible that there could be multiple entities involved, perhaps with different specialties. But, if only one, why male? And are we made in the entities image or is the entity beyond human comprehension? I've heard it described both ways. If it is sexless, then what is the implication by its adopting masculine pronouns. I find this curious. I must say that I am warming up to the idea of a Mr. and Mrs. Entity. Kind of like Ying and Yang. Both masculine and feminine natures being expressed.
It is only for our benefit Mike, yes there is no gender for the source of intelligence.
All we can know of that source is via the method that intelligence has chosen to speak with us and that to date has been Messengers. This all that we can know is given by that Message.
As to why we have Male and Females, it might be a bit like a magnetic attraction, that is, opposites attract.
There are lots of other things that have me scratching my head, but I'll end on this. We need our intelligent creator entity for any of this, we and the cosmos, to exist. A creator is required to bring anything into existence. What leaves me puzzled is where did our intelligent creator entity come from? Who or what created it? Some say it just is and always will be. But if the entity did not need a creator, then what if matter/energy (the stuff we and the cosmos are made of) just always has been and always will be. If there was no life on this planet, I think most folks would not have a problem with that. Lifeless rocks and gas just hurdling through space. No real creator seems necessary. And really, it seems that is kind of how it was for billions of years.
There is just some things above our pay grade Mike.
This is also based in logic. Think about us as a species and our ability to bring things from the unknown to the known.
No matter how hard we try, we can not create life, the formula is not ours to know.
Can the craft know the craftsman, can the painting know the painter?
Logically we have to realise we are not all knowing.
Regards Tony