• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!


  1. questfortruth

    Darwin's "origin of species" is Biblical?

    The author has written that the Supernatural Creator has made 4 or 5 original beings (using the wonder of Creation), from which all the planet's life forms have come. But today's Evolution Theory says there has been only one being whose appearance was random matter fluctuations.
  2. questfortruth

    Fix to Theory of Evolution

    Humans did not descend from primates, because humans are still primates. Primates, in turn, did not descend from waterfowl, because they are still waterfowl. Fish, in turn, did not evolve from algae, because fish are still algae. And so on, until the very first simplest organism, which did not...
  3. questfortruth

    Is Charles Darwin a false, non-orthodox Christian?

    The Jesus Christ in view of Darwin: He used Death (one of the names of satan) to create the World and Nature. Is not able to create humans, and by far - angels, but only animals. He is not God, but a mammal (animal) only. Hence, Darwinism is not true (it means "not faithful") to God. Shortly...
  4. questfortruth

    "No sex" law in Darwinism

    If the Y-chromosomal Adam lived 100,000 years ago, and Mitochondrial Eve lived 50,000 years ago. Does it matter that Adam and Eve didn't have sex with each other? If the Y-chromosomal Adam lived 100,000 years ago, and Mitochondrial Eve lived 50,000 years ago, then the maternal ancestor of this...
  5. questfortruth

    On the Theory of Evolution. Is it contradiction?

    FORMALISM OF SPECIES and SUB-SPECIES the Theory of Evolution is parasitic on Creationism. But recall the title of Darwin's book: the origin of species. Thus, the Last Universal Common Ancestor is the original species (however the number of individuals of this very first species is one: LUCA)...
  6. questfortruth

    Evolution is a fact?!

    Today Charles Darwin exists as a dead body. But, Darwin does exist. How? As a dead body. Thus, the question arises: When will Charles Darwin begin his proven path of evolution from non-living to living? "Evolution is a fact", he says. And today Darwin exists. In the form of a dead body, gases...
  7. questfortruth

    Is there true love if everyone obeys animal instincts?

    The theory of Evolution started badly. It began with the book The Origin of Species. However, the modern man did not descend from any of the known species. Not from monkeys, not from primates, not from rodents, not even from a single-celled amoeba a billion years ago. The modern man appeared...
  8. Loaai

    Darwin's Theory | True?

    Peace Be Upon You. So let's suppose that what Darwin said was right, Humanity has evolved from Apes, somehow it was proven scientifically that Apes were the origins of a creature that can think, understand, express his thoughts, have consciousness and choose his path in life, but then, does...
  9. SalixIncendium

    How Does the Existence of God Negate Darwinian Evolution?

    I would like to understand from members how they would think or believe that the existence of God negates Darwinian evolution. Does it?
  10. questfortruth

    Disproof of Darwinism

    Darwinism (in Natural Theology, but in science: "Theory of Evolution") is not a real theory, because the talks about random mutations rely heavily on luck. Anything, that needs luck is not a law of nature; because the law is the receipt, which for given circumstances gives the calculated...
  11. questfortruth

    Is Darwinism proven/accepted by official Science?

    The journals are enterprise for producing truth out of incoming manuscripts. Darwinism is accepted by all top journals. Thus, Darwinism is Scientifically proven. But Darwinism is wrong and absurd because humans can not be born by a monkey. Thus, Science has its agenda, it is the weapon of...
  12. questfortruth

    Theory of Darwin is not local. What does it mean?

    Because the Abiogenesis is thought to be outside the Theory of Evolution, and the latter is no longer associated with Charles Darwin [the biologists do not say ``Darwinian Theory of Evolution'' but simply ``Theory of Evolution''], then to describe difference between two competing worldviews...
  13. questfortruth

    Is Darwinism still fact after Science 02 Jan 1998: Vol. 279, Issue 5347, pp. 28-29?

    Below references proved the Biblical Creationism (which tells, that Adam’s Family is just 7000 years old), but in order to be published in Darwinists’ journals the authors are saying, that they have not proved Creationism, but simply have questioned some aspects of the Darwinism: Parsons, T...
  14. questfortruth

    If Theory of Darwin is fact, not theory, then Darwin Theory is wrong in its title already?

    Dialog: - If the Theory of Darwin is fact, not theory, then Darwin's Theory is wrong in its title already? - Evolution is a fact. Theory of Evolution is the theory of the fact. - No, google "Cosmology Crisis" then. The Theory of Evolution is defined as having the following sections: Theory of...
  15. questfortruth

    Fermi Paradox has disproven Darwin and UFO

    (Unfinished, disproven, unholy, and problematic) theory of Evolution consists of following chapters: Theory of Big Bang, Theory of Cosmic Evolution, Theory of Biological Evolution (Darwin's Theory), Social Darwinism. The Fermi paradox is the contradiction between Theory of Evolution and the...
  16. questfortruth

    baseless attempt to disprove Reality

    The Darwin's Biological Evolution is being used by wrong people as part in attempt to prove, that un-natural things are needless. Such attempt is the misuse of the Methodological Naturalism. After its completion, the God would be Scientifically Disproven (or as Dr. Friedrich Nietzsche would...
  17. questfortruth

    Zero Probability of Evolution. Atheism wrong?

    The likelihood that God did not participate in the creation of the universe is negligible (and likely zero). Why be an Atheist? Well, think for yourself, no matter how many garbage there is in the landfill, the rhinoceros will not be born there. From lifeless only lifeless comes -...
  18. Shia Islam

    John William Draper, a contemporary of Darwin, called it the "Mohammadan Theory of Evolution..!!!

    John William Draper, a contemporary of Darwin, called it the "Mohammadan Theory of Evolution..!!! Before beginning my post I want to say that I used to engage in lots of debates with the atheists. Indeed I used to read the atheists writings in order to reply to them…reading the atheists...