Zero Probability of Evolution. Atheism wrong?

[questfortruth]

The likelihood that God did not participate in the creation of the universe is negligible (and likely zero). Why be an Atheist?

Well, think for yourself, no matter how many garbage there is in the landfill, the rhinoceros will not be born there. From lifeless only lifeless comes - scientifically proved by Dr. Pasteur.

To say that the probability of the godless origin of life is 100 percent (because we are alive) is not scientific. This is the so-called "conditional" probability. Unconditional probability is negligible.

 

[YmirGF]

The likelihood that God did not participate in the creation of the universe is negligible (and likely zero). Why be an Atheist?

Well, think for yourself, no matter how many garbage there is in the landfill, the rhinoceros will not be born there. From lifeless only lifeless comes - scientifically proved by Dr. Pasteur.

To say that the probability of the godless origin of life is 100 percent (because we are alive) is not scientific. This is the so-called "conditional" probability. Unconditional probability is negligible.

Well, I'm glad we finally have this burning question settled.

 

[Altfish]

The likelihood that God did not participate in the creation of the universe is negligible (and likely zero). Why be an Atheist?

Well, think for yourself, no matter how many garbage there is in the landfill, the rhinoceros will not be born there. From lifeless only lifeless comes - scientifically proved by Dr. Pasteur.

To say that the probability of the godless origin of life is 100 percent (because we are alive) is not scientific. This is the so-called "conditional" probability. Unconditional probability is negligible.

Well that settles it then, shut down all science classes, close laboratories it's all down to an invisible man.

btw I can think for myself.
Can I suggest you learn about things you criticise - and not from Answers in Genesis or similar creationist indoctrination

 

[Shadow Wolf]

The likelihood that God did not participate in the creation of the universe is negligible (and likely zero).

Were is your evidence for this god? How do you propose we put forth a testable hypothesis for the idea that some god participated in creating the universe. If we find an entity that exists outside of this universe, how do we know if it's truly a god or not?

 

[SalixIncendium]

The likelihood that God did not participate in the creation of the universe is negligible (and likely zero).

Do you have something (besides the Bible) to support this claim?

Well, think for yourself, no matter how many garbage there is in the landfill, the rhinoceros will not be born there.

So if a pregnant rhinoceros goes into labor while walking through an landfill, she cannot give birth there. Got it.

To say that the probability of the godless origin of life is 100 percent (because we are alive) is not scientific. This is the so-called "conditional" probability. Unconditional probability is negligible.

Who says that?

 

[YmirGF]

Were is your evidence for this god? How do you propose we put forth a testable hypothesis for the idea that some god participated in creating the universe. If we find an entity that exists outside of this universe, how do we know if it's truly a god or not?

What I don't get is how ANYONE is in any position to determine if ANY being is a god. (I wonder if God has a lapel pin to clear things up perhaps?)

 

[questfortruth]

Do you have something (besides the Bible) to support this claim?

From lifeless only lifeless comes - scientifically proved by Dr. Pasteur.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

What I don't get is how ANYONE is in any position to determine if ANY being is a god. (I wonder if God has a lapel pin to clear things up perhaps?)

I've grown fond of asking "what if god has a god?" It's not only a stumper for fully convinced theists who have never pondered such a thing, it really reflects on how little we know about anything.

 

[questfortruth]

What I don't get is how ANYONE is in any position to determine if ANY being is a god. (I wonder if God has a lapel pin to clear things up perhaps?)

According to Wikipedia the God in more or less serious teachings -- the Superior Being. Most High.

 

[YmirGF]

I've grown fond of asking "what if god has a god?" It's not only a stumper for fully convinced theists who have never pondered such a thing, it really reflects on how little we know about anything.

I remember asking myself that many years ago. What kind of a being would a god find worthy of worship?

 

[questfortruth]

I've grown fond of asking "what if god has a god?" It's not only a stumper for fully convinced theists who have never pondered such a thing, it really reflects on how little we know about anything.

Nobody has created God. Created god is not God, but is idol.

 

[questfortruth]

Were is your evidence for this god? How do you propose we put forth a testable hypothesis for the idea that some god participated in creating the universe. If we find an entity that exists outside of this universe, how do we know if it's truly a god or not?

Are all theists delusional lunatics then? Are you judgemental?

 

[YmirGF]

According to Wikipedia the God in more or less serious teachings -- the Superior Being. Most High.

That doesn't answer my question. Take some time and actually think about my comment.

 

[SalixIncendium]

From lifeless only lifeless comes - scientifically proved by Dr. Pasteur.

Louis Pasteur's experiments dispelled spontaneous generation, not abiogenesis.

 

[YmirGF]

Louis Pasteur's experiments dispelled spontaneous generation, not abiogenesis.

Try saying it slowly to magnify the impact.

 

[questfortruth]

Louis Pasteur's experiments dispelled spontaneous generation, not abiogenesis.

Isn't it the same?

 

[Altfish]

From lifeless only lifeless comes - scientifically proved by Dr. Pasteur.

Can you quote the scientific paper please?

 

[Altfish]

Louis Pasteur's experiments dispelled spontaneous generation, not abiogenesis.

Oh, we're talking about that Dr Pasteur!!

 

[questfortruth]

Can you quote the scientific paper please?

Look it up in Wikipedia "L. P."

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Louis Pasteur's experiments dispelled spontaneous generation, not abiogenesis.

FAKE NEWS!!!! Everybody knows spontaneous generation, evolution, and abiogenesis and biogenesis are really all the same thing and it's perfectly appropriate and suitable to use them all interchangeably.