• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
Well, yes, Darwin said that the Lord Jesus has created the first life (if this is how you can interpret his vague phrase: "the first cell is chained to the throne of God").

No, I can't. If you can, I question your ability to rationalize.

1. people are still animals (one of the species of apes; however, this is self-contradiction: there was no evolution if humans are still animals), They said earlier that man descended from an ape. Now they say differently: man is still an ape. But then there is no evolution if we are still animals.

Perhaps before posting about taxonomy, you should educate yourself in taxonomy. Apes (hominoidea) is a superfamily, not a species. Man (homo sapiens) is a species.
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
They said earlier that man descended from an ape. Now they say differently: man is still an ape. But then there is no evolution if we are still animals.

You're confused because you haven't bothered to learn what an ape is.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Then it's pointless to try to have an intelligent discussion with those that have educated themselves.

To be fair, the same could be said in reverse. It's kinda pointless trying to have an intelligent conversation with those who deliberately refuse to educate themselves.

You and I may be the ones with egg on our face here, mate..
*hands over a baby wipe*
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
To be fair, the same could be said in reverse. It's kinda pointless trying to have an intelligent conversation with those who deliberately refuse to educate themselves.

You and I may be the ones with egg on our face here, mate..
*hands over a baby wipe*

When you're right, you're right.

Are these wipes anti-bacterial?
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
Today Charles Darwin exists as a dead body. But, Darwin does exist. How? As a dead body. Thus, the question arises:

When will Charles Darwin begin his proven path of evolution from non-living to living? "Evolution is a fact", he says.

And today Darwin exists. In the form of a dead body, gases, liquids. Perhaps when you turn on the faucet in the kitchen, you are drinking a molecule from Darwin's body. So, Darwin exists and you can ask your common sense when Darwin will start the path he has proven [through works of his followers] from the inanimate state to the living.

Well, yes, Darwin said that the Lord Jesus has created the first life (if this is how you can interpret his vague phrase: "the first cell is chained to the throne of God"), but his followers developed the spirit of Darwin's teachings to the point that the "progressive" humankind understood:

1. people are still animals (one of the species of apes; however, this is self-contradiction: there was no evolution if humans are still animals), They said earlier that man descended from an ape. Now they say differently: man is still an ape. But then there is no evolution if we are still animals.

2. black lives must be mercilessly oppressed,

3. schizophrenics and beggars must be castrated,

4. unwanted babies must be killed already in the womb; and that the

5. wildlife came without God's miracle from the non-living matter (and therefore life on Mars was in the distant past).

But God does not believe in godless Evolution, God is the Creator (it means, God is the most important Creationist).

Watch this before you post any more rubbish on evolution...


If you don't understand please feel free to ask questions
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
To avoid mistakes, I simply say: humans are some apes in Darwinism. Thus, there was no evolution from animal to human.

I've explained this to you before. I'm not going to waste my time explaining it again. You still have no idea what an ape is, given that you referred to them as a species.
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
To avoid mistakes, I simply say: humans are some apes in Darwinism.
That has nothing to do with "Darwinism". The definition of the scientific term ape implicitly includes human beings (along with monkeys, gorillas, chimps etc.), in the same way that the term mammal includes apes (along with horses, dogs, cats etc.) and the term animal includes mammals (along with fish, birds, lizards etc.).

Thus, there was no evolution from animal to human.
Nobody claims evolution from animal to human. Try again. You can't dismiss any theory if you don't understand what it actually says.
 

RabbiO

הרב יונה בן זכריה
Today Charles Darwin exists as a dead body. But, Darwin does exist. How? As a dead body. Thus, the question arises:

When will Charles Darwin begin his proven path of evolution from non-living to living? "Evolution is a fact", he says.."..........
Have you ever seen the movie “Duck Soup”? It stars the Marx Brothers. There is a very famous trial scene in the movie where Groucho addresses remarks to a jury regarding the character played his brother Chico which are quite appapros to you and the thoughts you have presented here.

I know there are other members of the forum who have seen the movie.
 
Top