• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!


  1. questfortruth

    Darwin's "origin of species" is Biblical?

    The author has written that the Supernatural Creator has made 4 or 5 original beings (using the wonder of Creation), from which all the planet's life forms have come. But today's Evolution Theory says there has been only one being whose appearance was random matter fluctuations.
  2. questfortruth

    If Bob is monkey, then he cannot come from monkeys.

    Look: there are two houses: House of Monkeys, and House of Humans. Bob came from House of Monkeys. Hence, Bob is not inside the House of Monkeys. Hence, he is not monkey. Why are there not monkeys in graveyards? My contribution to Theory is this: never call a human as monkey. For various...
  3. questfortruth

    Paper against Darwinism. Peer-reviewed.

    Please read and comment: Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life | New Scientist read the name of Journal. It is respected journal. The best journal. Read the title: "Darwin wrong." Not so shiny in Darwinian world today?
  4. questfortruth

    Darwinism is evil, isn't it?

    What kindness and understanding can be expected from people who know that monkeys gave birth to them through a common ancestor?
  5. questfortruth

    Is Di dirty-hot animal or respectful human?

    We share a common ancestor with macaques, - says Mr. satan. So, there were no macaques and orangutans in Princess Diana's family and ancestry? But only highly educated and cultural people gave birth to Princess Diana. Why am I sure? A common ancestor with monkeys is not a monkey at all! If he...
  6. questfortruth

    Is Darwinism useful?

    About me: After a nasty fight, all three referees of a forefront journal, "Stats," have given my manuscript admiration and approval. It is now official; I can think understandably. Is it Dawn of Big Data? QuestForTruth real name. I hope, it will contribute to the technology. A DEBATE...
  7. questfortruth

    Man is not an animal

    Animals do not have articulate speech and poets. Man is not an animal. Yes, the animals can communicate. But they have no articulate speech. There is difference: articulate communication, and non-articulate one. Articulate one has alphabet. Do whales have letters in alphabet order? Many humans...
  8. questfortruth

    Fix to Theory of Evolution

    Humans did not descend from primates, because humans are still primates. Primates, in turn, did not descend from waterfowl, because they are still waterfowl. Fish, in turn, did not evolve from algae, because fish are still algae. And so on, until the very first simplest organism, which did not...
  9. questfortruth

    Is Charles Darwin a false, non-orthodox Christian?

    The Jesus Christ in view of Darwin: He used Death (one of the names of satan) to create the World and Nature. Is not able to create humans, and by far - angels, but only animals. He is not God, but a mammal (animal) only. Hence, Darwinism is not true (it means "not faithful") to God. Shortly...
  10. questfortruth

    "No sex" law in Darwinism

    If the Y-chromosomal Adam lived 100,000 years ago, and Mitochondrial Eve lived 50,000 years ago. Does it matter that Adam and Eve didn't have sex with each other? If the Y-chromosomal Adam lived 100,000 years ago, and Mitochondrial Eve lived 50,000 years ago, then the maternal ancestor of this...
  11. questfortruth

    On the Theory of Evolution. Is it contradiction?

    FORMALISM OF SPECIES and SUB-SPECIES the Theory of Evolution is parasitic on Creationism. But recall the title of Darwin's book: the origin of species. Thus, the Last Universal Common Ancestor is the original species (however the number of individuals of this very first species is one: LUCA)...
  12. questfortruth

    Why Multiverse?

    The living Earth happens to be in a sphere with N lifeless planets. The probability of this event to happen was P=Q*V, where Q<1 is the probability of life to emerge on an Earth-like planet, V=(1-Q)^N is the probability that life has not emerged on N planets. Hence, by increasing the size of the...
  13. questfortruth

    Non-sterile Earth in sterile cosmos. Paradox.

    NASA tries not to violate the sterility of space by sterilizing its probes before launch. The Earth is not sterile, which means that the sterility of space is violated (after all, the Earth is a part of it). Is God to blame for the violation? God is "guilty" before satan because God has violated...
  14. questfortruth

    Zero probability for Evolution

    PREFACE, DIALOGS: Reviewer insults my scientific talents: "I can't make heads or tails of this word salad, tbh." To whom I reply: It is not different from any good scientific paper. I bet, you would say "word salat" to any of Dr. Hawking's papers. Provided, if he is not PhD and not...
  15. questfortruth

    Comprehension of Evolution and Creation

    AXIOM: It is better to have no theory than to have a false one. If the theory is proven wrong, and this wrong-hood is being hidden from the eyes of our students. Then the Christian can not support it. If teachers know that theory is false, but tell the students, that theory is sure as a fact...
  16. questfortruth

    Shortest Proof for Creationism?

    ABSTRACT: 1. proof, that there are transitional forms in the modern theory of evolution. 2. statement, that they are not capable of living and surviving. 3. conclusion, that there is God. Once upon a time, there were no humans on Earth. But the leading lifeform was bacteria. Therefore, there...
  17. questfortruth

    Can sane me doubt Evolution-ism?

    DISPROOF OF EVOLUTION-ISM CAN BE FUN Disproof #1 If God would not make monkeys, which animal (or plant, insect, fish, microbe) would Darwin choose for us as the next of kin (the closest relative)? And to the farthest relative? You are fish, says the video. No, the fish is a human. It is all...
  18. questfortruth

    Beginning of male line of your ancestors

    Where are no monkeys, fish, reptiles, and the Big Bang in Biblical account of human ancestors: "Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God." Luke 3:38. Humanity is a collection of creatures that are linked by conception. Every time...
  19. questfortruth

    Disproof of Evolution

    Was the very first human so different from the modern one that he was no longer a human? No, because he was the first Human. In short: he was a human. Conclusion: the evolution of mankind did not happen. Definition of humankind: a human gives birth to a human. Has Darwin an alternative...
  20. questfortruth

    Evolution is a fact?!

    Today Charles Darwin exists as a dead body. But, Darwin does exist. How? As a dead body. Thus, the question arises: When will Charles Darwin begin his proven path of evolution from non-living to living? "Evolution is a fact", he says. And today Darwin exists. In the form of a dead body, gases...