Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
Gee whiz!!! The terms "gay" and "straight" denote monosexual sexual orientation.
PLEASE read the point of my posts.
1. Humans are attracted to humans regardless of orientation
2. Humans have predominate attraction to X.
Some say their predominate attractions are polytheistic.
The mono-thing I read is more about reproduction.
3. I said heterosexuality and homosexuality, etc arent social constructs. It just tells us who one is attracted. Its a natural thing for many to divide people up.
People been trying to prove the gay-gene for ages. Its silly, really.
4. LGBQ can be seen as social constructs. If so, its based on history and how people are treated that they/we consider ourselves specific to our identity (LGBQ) and not our attraction (heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, etc) In other words, identity is a social construct. Attraction (physiological and psychological) is not.
I guess that view depends on the person. Many anti-gays think we chose to like one sex over another. Some feel it is the product of our environment while others upbringing. I never heard of biological attraction being a product of ones environment. I mean, my environment promotes mono-attraction and orientation. Im realizing sexual orientation is on a sliding scale not mono-orientation hence why you got LGBTQSDSF etc.
But sexual orientation refers to who one is attracted to. It doesnt say you cant be attracted to other people; we are still human. It just says our predominate attraction.
Online is very bias on finding evidence that people can have a predominate attraction to X person and not to Y. I mean, we see it for reproduction, for example, but even that is up for debate.
You are making conclusions on points I never made.
That, and isolated words to convey an argument doesnt help with understanding my point first.
Last edited: