Ayjaydee
Active Member
I dont see that the universe must have a pointWell, I would say 'worse off'. The universe would seem a more pointless and depressing thing to me.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I dont see that the universe must have a pointWell, I would say 'worse off'. The universe would seem a more pointless and depressing thing to me.
I don't say 'must' either but rather 'does'. I see the universe as a creation of universal consciousness.I dont see that the universe must have a point
I'm not convinced it was created at allI don't say 'must' either but rather 'does'. I see the universe as a creation of universal consciousness.
Well, I would say 'worse off'. The universe would seem a more pointless and depressing thing to me.
Couldn't heaven be seen as your higher plane of existence?Well what exactly is it that ceases to exist?Ceasing to exist is an assumption in my eyes.
I don't buy into heaven and hell. I live without that burden. I don't see the afterlife as punishing nor rewarding.
The liberating part is shedding the body of suffering. Growing past the roots of being into a higher planes of existence.
Believing in an afterlife makes me extremely patient, and less desperate to fulfill my life in the here and now.
I think karma is something you create with other people. People make their own heavens, and own hells in living. There seems to be a justice to having a good life. Spiritual growth into love, peace, and joy is my main goal in living. In the absence of the existence of purpose there seems to be higher purpose anyways. And that makes me wonder if there is more out there.
Couldn't heaven be seen as your higher plane of existence?
Couldn't heaven be seen as your higher plane of existence?
Buddhist theory provides for trouble in paradises. LolThe higher planes of existence are only going to be what people make of it. So I expect the same human struggles in it.
Probably not, but you are welcome to.
Well, that's a different issue than the one I was addressing with thread question.I'm not convinced it was created at all
And I see an intelligent spiritual understanding of reality (including our evolution through many lives) as beneficial to our strive to be compassionate to others.Not to me. I have had enough experiences in life to appreciate what humans can have to make life as they might want, given that we often have to endure much pain, struggle, etc. along with that which enhances our lives, and that many others are not so fortunate. But then that is up to us to rectify - to make our existence better for others as much as for ourselves, and I don't see the concept of some kind of afterlife as being in any way helpful - when what we do now on Earth is what will help others.
Well I for one believe in the afterlife not as an add-on to my particular religion but because of the paranormal/psychic evidence. It is part of my reality.Afterlives just seem various forms of carrot to believe a particular religion. Obviously all can't be true, and as mentioned in the OP, do seem to come with negative effects.
I'm not aware of any authenticated reports of societies with no belief in an afterlife — it's the default position. Disbelief is generally the result of exposure to second-hand philosophy among the Western chattering classes. As for the points raised,
Most religions do not believe that life on Earth is inherently worthless and merely a preparation for another existence. In theory Christians, Buddhists, and Hindus do, but theory and practice are not always the same thing.
Belief that one is chosen others are reprobate may be silly, but it's seldom a disadvantage for those who believeit. Similarly, what would be the disadvantage in believing in reincarnation?
Of course, the whole question is spurious. What matters about your beliefs is whether they are true.
Much differentWell, that's a different issue than the one I was addressing with thread question.
I am actually a believer in Advaita philosophy (non-dualism = God and creation are not-two) for reasons too involved to get into in this thread about afterlife. So my perspective is probably different than yours. I see the universe as all a play/drama of Consciousness/God/Brahman.
Some of the issues:
* Suicides might be more common - because existence might be perceived as being far better in Heaven, or because some see it as fulfilling some duty (Suicide-bombers?), or the rewards are often made out to be more attractive (72 virgins?), etc.
* Living a life in preparation for some future life, rather than living as if this was the only existence and treasuring it as such.
* Waiting for some kind of apocalypse or future event, as predicted by some religious doctrine (The Endtimes).
* Believing in Hell, and perhaps the concept of evil, such that some will believe many will be destined for such - like atheists, for example.
* A belief in a 'chosen people', destined for some paradise, and perhaps the separation from others that such a view might bring.
* A belief that we are reincarnated into something else after death, often based on what we have done whilst being alive, or blaming a past existence for what we might have now.
Probably quite a few more, but are these enough to consider such beliefs as problematic and not very helpful?
Some of the issues:
* Suicides might be more common - because existence might be perceived as being far better in Heaven, or because some see it as fulfilling some duty (Suicide-bombers?), or the rewards are often made out to be more attractive (72 virgins?), etc.
* Living a life in preparation for some future life, rather than living as if this was the only existence and treasuring it as such.
* Waiting for some kind of apocalypse or future event, as predicted by some religious doctrine (The Endtimes).
* Believing in Hell, and perhaps the concept of evil, such that some will believe many will be destined for such - like atheists, for example.
* A belief in a 'chosen people', destined for some paradise, and perhaps the separation from others that such a view might bring.
* A belief that we are reincarnated into something else after death, often based on what we have done whilst being alive, or blaming a past existence for what we might have now.
Probably quite a few more, but are these enough to consider such beliefs as problematic and not very helpful?
No.
Unless it can be demonstrated that:
A) the beliefs are false
B) they cause harm in sizeable numbers of people
C) they are not outweighed by the benefits of believing
D) the alternatives are better not worse
Of the ones mentioned:
The encouragement to suicide for heaven might be countered by the discouragement to suicide from hell or judgement, or by a duty to missionize to get others to heaven, or balanced against non-afterlife belief in annihilation which ends present suffering in combination the pessimistic nature of the non-afterlife view. Additionally, I see no real evidence that afterlife believers are more prone to suicide than non-believers, and I would actually suspect the opposite given religious prohibitions against self-killing.
Living life in preparation may not be a negative thing - if preparation includes encouragement to moral acts, or self-development or whatever. This also assumes that one cannot both treasure this life and prepare for an afterlife,which seems obviously false.
Belief in an apocalypse is not the same as belief in an afterlife - they are not the same thing.
Belief in hell may or may not be part of an afterlife view, and may or may not be harmful. This point needs expansion.
A belief in a chosen people is not an afterlife POV - it may or may not be connected.
Belief in reincarnation may or may not be part of an afterlife view, and may or may not be harmful. This point does not explain.
I'm not aware of any authenticated reports of societies with no belief in an afterlife — it's the default position. Disbelief is generally the result of exposure to second-hand philosophy among the Western chattering classes. As for the points raised,
Most religions do not believe that life on Earth is inherently worthless and merely a preparation for another existence. In theory Christians, Buddhists, and Hindus do, but theory and practice are not always the same thing.
Belief that one is chosen others are reprobate may be silly, but it's seldom a disadvantage for those who believeit. Similarly, what would be the disadvantage in believing in reincarnation?
If , by afterlife, you mean another life for the soul or essence of the being existing in this one undergoing reincarnation then no, not all "religions" see it that way. Therevada Buddhists see other realms but the beings themselves that inhabit these realms are not recycled versions of beings from this realm. They liken it to the flame of a candle that was brought to life by the flame of another candle.
who was it that's said "you will not die" ?
'
Some of the issues:
Probably quite a few more, but are these enough to consider such beliefs as problematic and not very helpful?