tas8831
Well-Known Member
He has a history of running from errors. They all do.Still a direct quote whether you want to run away from it or not.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He has a history of running from errors. They all do.Still a direct quote whether you want to run away from it or not.
Of course you have. Name or link to 3 of them. And then EXPLAIN why you think these papers have merit.Rhetoric claiming we have no answer for this, yet I've read many position papers explaining this.
He has a history of running from errors. They all do.
Of course you have. Name or link to 3 of them. And then EXPLAIN why you think these papers have merit.
Let's first see those papers before asking anyone to commit to anything.And after, you will repent and convert? (Not that I'm proselytizing).
Because they evolved and adapted..
Why do species on islands resemble species on the nearest mainland, even if there is a vast difference in environmental conditions between the island and the mainland?
You kidding!? Evolving is a God given created trait. Nothing to do with the TOE, and man descending from animals.Creationists cannot explain away this evidence. They just pretend it doesn't exist.
It does show the effectiveness of creationist tactics to derail any discussion that contradicts their beliefs..
Boy! this is one hell of a ****** up thread.
Thirty-four posts and people are still debating grammar rather than "The biogeographic evidence for evolution." but it is Sunday, god's day, so maybe that's the problem.
.
I would be interested in seeing them too. Since the existence of them was mentioned to imply that they were the truth and an explanation for the evidence that supersedes biogeographic explanations it would be interesting to know of them.Let's first see those papers before asking anyone to commit to anything.
Evos have a history of making up errors. They all do.He has a history of running from errors. They all do.
Who said God created individual species?
Did God make Caucasians, and then make dark skinned people, and then...? Have you read the Bible Hubert?
Ummm...those aren't examples of 'different species'.
Ummm. What examples are you talking about.
I'm responding to the OP.
By standard rules of English, your post #2 seems to suggest that Caucasians and dark-skinned people are different species.
Yeah, I thought you were talking about this guy.This is Steve Austin:
No - after which I will I will see whether or not you actually have read what you claim to have; whether or not these papers have merit; whether or not you understand them well enough to discuss them.And after, you will repent and convert? (Not that I'm proselytizing).Of course you have. Name or link to 3 of them. And then EXPLAIN why you think these papers have merit.Rhetoric claiming we have no answer for this, yet I've read many position papers explaining this.
No need to make up the errors creationsits make. They are easily documentable. I refer you to the sad tale of the "Eve gene" for one example of a recent whopper of a doozy.Evos have a history of making up errors. They all do.
No - after which I will I will see whether or not you actually have read what you claim to have; whether or not these papers have merit; whether or not you understand them well enough to discuss them.
After your own-goal re: Darwin=Hitler, I do so look forward to your attempted defense of your claims.
"Hitler and Stalin did what they did as Darwinists."Please post here where I wrote "Darwin is Hitler", I wrote rather that Hitler felt led by Darwin and Social Darwinism to kill/murder.
“I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty Creator. By warding off the Jews I am fighting for the Lord’s work.”--Adolph Hitler, 1936I wrote rather that Hitler felt led by Darwin and Social Darwinism to kill/murder.
Trying to trace back modern genetics to Eve won't work. You blame creos for making the same mistake science does in trying to do so?No need to make up the errors creationsits make. They are easily documentable. I refer you to the sad tale of the "Eve gene" for one example of a recent whopper of a doozy.
Please post here where I wrote "Darwin is Hitler", I wrote rather that Hitler felt led by Darwin and Social Darwinism to kill/murder.
No, I blame creos for pontificating about things that they show themselves to be amazingly ignorant on.Trying to trace back modern genetics to Eve won't work. You blame creos for making the same mistake science does in trying to do so?