A, i never said you were, i said you are entitled to your belief.
I know. I don't need your permission, or approval.
B, maybe you could have explained yourself better.
Sometimes the fault is in the reader, not the writer.
C, no, there is no evidence of god, there is however confirmation bias in claiming certain things/events must god because god fills a gap.
I said evidence, not belief
Ah, the old 'God of the gaps' argument.
I repeat, there IS evidence for God. It's just not evidence that you accept as such. NOBODY believes in something without evidence. There is always something that is at the basis of belief, no matter how odd/illogical/weird/impossible someone else may think that evidence is.
Do not make the error of thinking that empirical evidence is the only kind of evidence there is, just because it's the only kind you will accept.
As to the 'God of the gaps,' thing, I have no problem with saying that if we don't know how something was done, we say 'God did it.' I also have absolutely no problem (and we have been told to do this, btw) in trying to figure out HOW God did it. That's the true wonder of being human and being here; to learn about and understand the how of things. Learning that does not disprove God any more than getting the recipe for that fantastic German chocolate cake one loves proves that the baker doesn't actually exist. So...if we come to find out that live began in some primordial ooze that some lucky lightning strike turned on, we say...ah...so THAT'S how it's done! Can we do it, too?
But this thread is about what happens to our concept of God when humanity goes extinct. Well, If my concept of Him is accurate...nothing happens. He goes on to deal with all the other worlds that have His children living on them. If my concept of Him is not accurate, then it dies when I do; no need to wait for the whole of humanity to go pfffft.