Humanistheart
Well-Known Member
Alright, let's go all the way back to the beginnning, shall we?
Here HH makes a point about suicide around Xmas, ignoring the idea of SEASONAL DEPRESSION that many people get during THE WINTER TIME during which Christmas JUST HAPPENS to take place..
A good point MW, somewhat debatable, still your ability to present a counter argument does nothing to allieviate the fact that storm could not. If storm could have presented that point herself, when it was appropriate, we could have had an actual debate on the topic.
Here is HH's first big misunderstand (IMO). Saying that by wishing a non-Christian a "Happy Holiday" aka "Good Day" that they are mindlessly shoving their beliefs onto someone and telling them that they NEED TO CELEBRATE Christmas. (A very paranoid thought)..
This would be a missunderstanding, but I believe it is yours as I don't recall commenting on the 'happy holidy' expresion.
Here is HH's second misunderstanding. By telling people that their religious holiday should be under attack and that they SHOULDN'T say things like "Happy Holidays".
See above. Also, this statment had nothing to do with the quote you put above it, which was in fact from Storm, not myself.
Well, HH's beliefs here would be that Xmas should be under attack..
You could perhaps argue this (dropping the plural usuage mind you) but again, storm was not able to. Your making a cotent argument, again, does not change the fact that storm failed to do so, and given this post seems to be about justifying storm's ability to debate your main point is obviously flawed.
Here it's basically becoming a full-out cat-fight..
This is true, the thread degraded quite rapidly.
Well, by reading it proves that you do have beliefs, that you're trying to push them on others (or so it comes across), and that by not taking in all sides of the equation they probably ARE ignorant..
Possibly, if your assumption had been correct.
Which I think I have just proven..
Hardly, but excellent try.
Or, more accurately, why we should all be emarrassed for HH.
No, again I'll reffer you to the point that your making an actual argument does nothing to change the fact that storm could not or would not do so. This is how a debate is supposed to go, you put out claims and arguments, I addressed them, and so on and so forth. Storm outright refused to do this.
Last edited: