Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When to "provide evidence" making claims? !
On RF when I make a claim "I can hold my breath" till someone imposes "you should provide evidence"
Is this correct? Are there examples of claims which can be made without having to provide evidence?
I could think of a few claims, where the smart ones will think twice before asking evidence
So, what determines if imposing "you should provide evidence" is correct
Where lies the line between "to prove or not to prove"?
Please create examples...
To me, religion means re-union with from where we all started the journey of life in the beginning. According to this religion we all emerged, and will merge back in God. Our journey began from God and will end back in God. According to this religion rebirth/reborn/migration is involved.
Do you have questions ? I will try to answer and you are welcome to ask.
But, kindly note that following replies will NOT be entertained:
More than one question at a time, so that you could understand...
If you tell someone " you have the wrong faith or belief, you are doomed"
Would that not be to put you self in Gods place and pretend you know that someone else is so bad as a human being that this person will be doomed to hell when time is up?
Can that statement in it self send the person who judge others, be what lead themselves to go to that very place of hell instead?
Now this is kind of a joke. I will use the idea of proof, evidence, truth and what not, so show that all of these ideas have a limit.
Part 1: If you accept that some types of your behavior have limits, e.g. because gravity limits your mobility, I will show that proof or any of its variant also have a limit. If you deny that there is limit, you are in effect denying that, what you are experiencing now, is real. That is the methodology of testing I use. I don't test using objective proof. I...
There was the university subject "Scientific Atheism" in the USSR. Why?
What are the options for a naturalist in the realm of faith and spiritual?
The naturalist is the known title of a scientist like a physicist, or biologist.
Can a consistent human be naturalist and deist? No, because in deism the God has acted even if only at the beginning: no naturalistic explanation of the Big Bang then possible. Theism is not deism, therefore God acts in theism as well. Thus, remains: the scientists...
There are two levels of nature description: macro and micro. On the macro level, the paradox arises because any kind of stuff, which falls into Black Holes, ends up in the same outcome: the black body radiation spectrum of particles. Thus, at this level of description, the "unitarity" of Quantum Mechanics becomes broken.
But I argue, that happens transition of information from macro to micro level. The information becomes encoded into micro-level: the...
Assumption / Idea: Rebirth / reborn.
Brief description: One get birth in new human-family (NOT-animal) after every death -- Its an everlasting cycle of deaths and births.
Any other information: You are welcome to ask.
Taking the above assumption / Idea of rebirth / reborn into consideration:
Question is: Do you see this everlasting cycle of deaths and births as some kinda problem which must have END ?
Kindly note: please do refrain from posting in this thread if you don't like to assume...
Page 4 of 853