It doesn't make you look bad...you do that all by yourself quite well enough. And comparing to that term is ridiculous, since being gay is not on the same level as expecting your wife to put out when she doesn't want to and expecting her to pretend to like it to boot. That makes you a monster.
Well, thanks. You're entitled to that opinion. Luckily it's a minority opinion. The point of comparing it to calling someone gay was that some people ignorantly see being gay as a bad thing, and so they take it as an insult. The same applies here. That's not really in insult as he meant it to be, but it comes off that way to other people who hold the same ignorance.
Sex is NEVER a "right"...ever. Sex is something to share as an act of intimacy within a relationship. As soon as you relegate it to the position of "right" you have just excused rape. Period.
That's a little illogical. Sure, sex is a right. Just like your partner talking to you and compromising on some issues is a right. That isn't to say that a partner is entitled to sex any time they want. It's quite a huge jump from there to rape, and that's nothing more than an appeal to emotion.
It's not the matter of just a different viewpoint mball. It's reaction to something that is wholly atrocious and medieval. The idea that you cannot begin to comprehend how relegating a woman to a blow up doll is demeaning to say the least.
Except that I'm not relegating a woman to that. You're taking it that way because of your sensitivity to the subject. That's why I mentioned looking at it objectively. Unless you can do that, you're only going to see a very biased and narrow-minded view.
By the way, what's medieval about expecting a man to pleasure his wife, even if he doesn't feel like it?
Just because the vast majority of people here disagree with you on this doesn't mean that the ones who actually come forward to say so are the ones with the problem mball. It's truly NOT just an "emotional" thing. It's a common sense, human rights, psychological well being thing. I contend that if you don't get that it is you who just doesn't understand...and probably never will.
No, it really is an emotional thing. People take offense to anything that could be construed as "a medieval idea", when really it's just a matter of those people refusing to see what the other person is actually saying, all because of their emotional reaction to the subject matter.
Why should he? You certainly aren't learning one darn thing here. Oh, and your perspective is not in any way, shape or form reasonable. It may well be valid in a country where women are property...but not reasonable anywhere.
I don't need to learn anything. I am capable of understanding others points-of-view and not dismissing them for no reason. I understand that for some people sex is not a priority, and for others it is. I understand that some people have an inflated idea of sex. I understand that my situation isn't the majority. I am not the one calling others monsters and pigs because of their view on this.
Your last sentence shows yet again that you simply don't understand what I'm saying. Otherwise, you'd realize that this isn't about chauvinism or thinking women are property. You seem to have conveniently ignored all of the times that I've stated that this goes for husbands, too, whose wives have a higher sex drive. Hence, it obviously has nothing to do with me thinking that women are property.
Again, all you have to do is go back and read my posts without the whole emotional trigger that some of this has, and you'll see that I'm very reasonable about this.