where Luke makes clear that Jesus is the Literal son of God? Luke 1:26 never mentioned "Literal son of God" it mentioned About Virgin born. Before i made clear that Jesus virgin born never can make him great. Before already God created Adam and Melchzadek(hebrews 7:1) without Father or Mother. So its so easy for God to creat Jesus without Father! Bible made us clear that Jesus was "Servant of God" as like Issac, Jacob, moses in in acts 3:13
Of course it is not going to say literal son of God. That is pointless. However, if you read Luke 1:26-38, it clearly states that God was responsible for the impregnation of Mary and that they child that she conceived was the Son of God. It is definitely referring to the literal Son of God. Not a servant of God. The Greek makes this clear.
My Question why this dirty game? Why you falsely try to prove your lie trinity
First, I'm not a Christian. I don't believe in the Trinity. Second, your translation is wrong. Look at the Bible scholars on this subject. Specifically Bart Erhman, who is a leader in the field. The translation is not a god. It is God. If you look at Jewish tradition, as well as Christian tradition, and just context in general, it is ridiculous to believe that John was saying the Word was a god. Especially when you bring the idea into a Jewish context.
Its actually "Gods" which in hebrew bible Elohim. But they translated there gods!
Psalm 82:6 mentioned every messenger of God called as God and there God meaning a great person aka messenger.
I'm guessing you haven't studied ancient Judaism very well. The fact is, Judaism, or sects of, were polytheistic. They believed in multiple gods. Later on, they turned away from the idea of worshipping many gods, and instead only worshipped their God. However, even then, they still accepted that their were other gods.
before you said Jesus is God what meaning They are equal and there nothing is clear that Jesus is the literal son of God! Prove it
I'm pretty sure I have. Matthew and Luke, in the virgin birth stories, are very clear on this point.
Again, I personally do not believe this idea; as far as I'm concerned, Mary became pregnant after having intercourse with Joseph; however, the Bible is very clear on it's position.
You said Jesus is the begotten son of God. We use this word where have a sex relation son. Also before you said Mary was impregnated by God!! There you used "By God" not "By Holy spirit" indeed you abused to God!!!
I used John 3:16, showing that it was considered that Jesus was the literal son of God. However, if you remember correctly, I also said that the word begotten could be a mistranslation, and actually mean the only son. Either way, it is referring to the idea that Jesus is the literal son of God.
Also, impregnation, in this case, does not need to be from a sexual relation. However, it is clear that Mary was impregnated by God miraculously. And the Holy Spirit, as I've already supported, is God.
Luke 1:26-38 and Quran 3:42-49 very clear about Jesus virgin birth. You can tell Mary was impregnated by holy Spirit what was totally miraculously and God commanded to Holy spirit for it.
So you agree with me then, as the Bible makes it quite clear that the Holy Spirit and God are one and the same.
yes its the christian view and their false belief!! According to Jesus teaching Our Father is only one meaning His Father also our Father!
I'm not saying it is the correct view. I think the virgin birth is false. However, the Bible is clear on this point; that Jesus is the Son of God.
you believe it or not BUT TRUTH IS VERY CLEAR MORE THAN ERRORS!
I'm not talking about truth here. I'm talking about what the Bible states. Whether or not it is true, I don't care.