Oh, well, Google! How can I possibly argue with that!
The reason the examples you posted are not pornography is because they are intended to be idealizations of the human body as expressions of physical beauty, not as an objects for sexual use. Did you look up Balthus' paintings? It might help to illuminate the difference.
Google is a source of knowledge if used properly, sorry you are not interested in such knowledge and dismiss it out of hand.
Each of those works has in the past been deemed pornographic. A copy of the statue of david has been considered pornographic as late ar 2020. Although this is denied by those who covered his nakedness
I know of Balthus, i personally don't consider his work pornographic. You eant pornographic art try Paolo Serpieri
Last edited: