Audie
Veteran Member
Similar to a point.
If you can overcome the arguably supreme hurdle of one side referring to an entity known to the exist (namely the universe) while the other side uses a supremely tentative entity (God) instead.
Maybe it is just me, but I have a real strong dislike for presuming the existence of deities just because.
As language tools, deities are great. As sources of inspiration, they are powerful, delicate ideas to be handled with due care.
As cosmological ideas, though, they are just a distraction.
That is an odd subject matter to address right after addressing the origin of existence with no transition and no context.
There is definitely no reason to presume cosmic significance to humanity. Human evolution is biological and cultural. Those are entirely separate fields from that of cosmology. Arguably, there can be no more distant fields, even.
Zactly. Assuming an undetectable super being that is
greater than the universe, as a way to explain the universe
is really kind of bonkers.