I we were made out of dirt...

[DavidFirth]

And isn't that nice.

.​

Your deep hatred for God and all things Christian changes nothing, Skwim. All posts like this do is show your hatred and your ignorance.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Water is a wonderful solvent in which organic chemical reactions can take place.
And gin is too toxic.

Bravely said!

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Your deep hatred for God and all things Christian changes nothing, Skwim. All posts like this do is show your hatred and your ignorance.

What an absolutely fascinating and ultimately debased view of @Skwim's thought. Nothing he said had any hatred in it whatever. But somehow, you have come to the conclusion that anybody who doesn't automatically think of themselves as evil, awful, icky and not even very nice must not like God -- because that's what God thinks of you.

As a religious view, it's certainly not something I could ever recommend. (I rather suspect God doesn't recommend it either, but mostly people with that view aren't listening to God, they're listening to people with an agenda that largely includes getting rich.)

 

[Skwim]

Your deep hatred for God and all things Christian changes nothing, Skwim. All posts like this do is show your hatred and your ignorance.

Post #22

Skwim: (image 1, which says: "Cancer: because I sinned")

DavidFirth: "No. [it's because] We all did.​

Post #38

Skwim: [amending my original image] (image 2 says: "Cancer: because you sinned") "Well of course,

because that's what good and all loving beings do."

DavidFirth: "There is none good, but one, that is, God."​

In other words, it's because of god's goodness that children have cancer.



Post #48

Skwim: "And this (image 2) you think is god's good."

DavidFirth: [Finally recognizing his blunder, he tries backpedaling from his assertion that cancer is out of god's goodness] "No, but it is because of our evil."​

Which really only amounts to the reason god has no problem with children getting cancer



Post #81

Skwim: "And isn't that nice" (image 3 saying: "Sorry mom, but Skwim and DavidFirth are reprobates -god")​

Obviously caught in his own ridiculousness, DavidFirth abandons his loosing argument and is sadly driven to counter with another ad hominem attack: (Isn't the first time is it Dave. )

DavidFirth: "Your deep hatred for God and all things Christian changes nothing, Skwim. All posts like this do is show your hatred and your ignorance."

​

I can only say;

Thank you DavidFirth for showing us another example of twisted Christian apologetics.

.

 

[Duke_Leto]

No, but we brought sin into the world, cancer and death with it. When you look at the child in that picture you see the direct result and wage gained from sin.

Who brought that exactly? Adam? Eve?

Nevertheless, I recall that in Genesis, God directly curses the world because of Adam and Eve -- death and pain enter the world as a result of God's punishment, not as a direct result of their sin.

 

[Jainarayan]

Again, God didn't give cancer to the child. That's an ignorant statement.

Who gave the child cancer? Isn't it God who punishes us for our transgressions?

 

[gnostic]

Also, the Big Bang and macroevolution are just ways of trying to justify the belief that no God exists. All of this just follows logically. Logic is all the atheist has to stand on.

Actually, I have decided. You are both utterly ignorant and dishonest.

One of the pioneers of the Big Bang was Georges Lemaître. I have already written Lemaître was a Roman Catholic priest and Belgian astrophysicist.

That you are trying to claim the Big Bang is the work of atheists, just how st#### you really are.

Likewise, Charles Darwin was both a Christian and an agnostic. He was never an atheist and said so in one of his letters. That you don't know anything about Darwin's life, make you look completely uneducated.

Second, there are many Christians and Jews here, as well as other theist groups, who both the Big Bang and evolution, and are still religious, just demonstrated how blind you are, when you ignored them.

You have shown that you lack the intelligence and integrity todebate this thread, openly and honestly. I just wonder what you would say to Jesus when you have just lied to me.

Is lying not considered a sin, David?

 

[Jainarayan]

So you believe in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel?

No.

 

[gnostic]

So who says I'm not choosing God's way?

You are deliberately lying to people here.

You really have no shame, do you?

 

[Skwim]

Who brought that exactly? Adam? Eve?

Nevertheless, I recall that in Genesis, God directly curses the world because of Adam and Eve -- death and pain enter the world as a result of God's punishment, not as a direct result of their sin.

Exactly. As Christians would have it, their benevolent and all-loving god decided that because of the mistake of two---count 'em 2---individuals all of humanity would henceforth suffer. In almost all judicial systems there's a standard dictating the punishment fit the crime, which may possibly have been put in place after recognizing god's total lack of objective fairness and justice.

.

 

[Jainarayan]

You are deliberately lying to people here.

You really have no shame, do you?

Care to explain and specify?

Oh wait, I get it.

 

[Quintessence]

*** thread locked for staff review ***​