Is it? Because last time I checked, a majority of theists, christians in particular, have no problem with biological evolution. The catholic church's official position is that evolution occured. That alone supposedly accounts for more then a billion christians.
It is true that a disturbingly high number of americans seem to be biology deniers... but that hardly accounts for a majority worldwide.
Having said that, a LOT of biologists, evolutionary biologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, etc are actually theists.
So it seems to me that your opening statement isn't really accurate.
I'm sure you can "interprete" your sacred texts in such a way so that you can marry them with modern scientific views, but let's not pretend as if your sacred texts tell the same story as modern science, because it really doesn't.
There's nothing in the quran which suggests that the first generations of stars went supernove and thereby created the heavier elements which our current bodies are made up of, billions of years later. Nothing at all.
Yet curiously, such always only seems to be the case
after science comes up with things. Never before.
You might also want to look up islamic acceptance of mainstream biology in islamic nations in the middle east. You say that the Quran agrees with modern science, and that modern science is even
verifiable in the Quran. Yet a great number of muslims, in some countries an insane majority, heavily disagrees with you on that and in fact claims the exact opposite.
................
You get a winner for saying what I said but
saying it better with fewer words.
But like with me you may get only the
Ultimate Authority, not a gold medal.