Christian orthodoxy demands that God is eternally perfect so evolution (if such a thing makes sense for an atemloral entity) is out of question.
Any entity that does not change and grow is unworthy of being called a god, and isn't suited for the job.
Two conflicting views.
If we are talking about the Christian god, which is said to be perfect, then Apologes has to be correct. Consider a perfect circle. Change any aspect of its contour, and it ceases to be a perfect circle.
But in traditions that allow a god to be less than perfect, there is room for evolution.
Since I'm an atheist, the question isn't really too relevant. Something has to exist to evolve.
What is relevant is how the concept of God in Western culture has evolved. First, he was the angry, jealous, judgmental, vengeful, genocidal god of the Old testament, then the gentle god of the New Testament, and now we see this god evolving further, as when we are often told that His hell is just a metaphor for separation. He would never be that mean.
Attn Mods: Any chance of getting an "interesting" judgit added? Or an "agree" icon? Sometimes like, informative, creative, useful, etc. aren't quite right.