I am serious. I want the ECB Seigniorage to be undone.It's when you say stuff like this, that I really can't take you seriously.
This matter is very very, very serious
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am serious. I want the ECB Seigniorage to be undone.It's when you say stuff like this, that I really can't take you seriously.
I am relieved he stays in Rome, then.And the reason is because they campaign in illegal ways and employ militaristic weaponsgrade psyOps to manipulate voters by bombarding them with tailored and targetted fake news, generated specifically to exploit the psychological profile of the target.
An evil genius who's actively pursueing the destabilization of western secular democracies.
He is a criminal who belongs in jail.
I am serious. I want the ECB Seigniorage to be undone.
This matter is very very, very serious
I am relieved he stays in Rome, then.
Just as the Remain campaign said prior to the Referendum - but it was called Project Fear and ridiculed
You have a say as long as you are members.But it's true,there have been changes,from a trading block gradual changes have been made where we've had no say in any,the only way the EU is going is a federal state,this has been on british minds for years.
But it's true,there have been changes,from a trading block gradual changes have been made where we've had no say in any
,the only way the EU is going is a federal state,this has been on british minds for years.
I'm a European first and a Belgian second. That's just how I roll, so we'll have other views right out the gates.
But I wonder: why would you consider a "united states of europe" a bad thing? And don't give me any nationalistic conceptual buzzwords filled mumbo jumbo about "patriotism" and the abstract notion of "sovereignty". I mean in a clear and practical way: what would be the problem with that?
National identities are fictional as well as worthless.Because we are different...and our diversity is our strength...But I am for preserving this diversity, by defending the single National identities.
I speak 5 European languages, that shows how much how love Europe.
Well...from space you see a very defined boot-like peninsula. Very very natural construct.National identities are fictional as well as worthless.
They neither need nor deserve protection.
Word has it that Italy, as such, has always been a very artificial construct. I am willing to bet that it still is.
What kind of people sprouts from its soil?Well...from space you see a very defined boot-like peninsula. Very very natural construct.
Because we are different...and our diversity is our strength...
But I am for preserving this diversity, by defending the single National identities.
I speak 5 European languages, that shows how much how love Europe.
It's not so much as what currently keeps them down as what will make them go up instead...
Not unless there are clear agreements concerning movement of people.
Otherwise, there will be extra checks and customs. These things cost money and require funding.
How is that going to be paid for, do you think?
Then there are the means to get to Italy. Most likely by plane.
You assume that airtravel from EU to the UK and back will remain unchanged after a chaotic brexit?
Here in Antwerp, there's a small airport that is already fearing for its future as it was going all-in on flights to and from the UK.
International flights are no problem if there are treaties concerning movements of goods and people with a customs union etc. No so much if there isn't.
Who's "we"? Because to my knowledge, the vast majority of such decisions in the EU is done by consensus of all members.
If you say so.
I'm a European first and a Belgian second. That's just how I roll, so we'll have other views right out the gates.
But I wonder: why would you consider a "united states of europe" a bad thing? And don't give me any nationalistic conceptual buzzwords filled mumbo jumbo about "patriotism" and the abstract notion of "sovereignty". I mean in a clear and practical way: what would be the problem with that?
You have a say as long as you are members.
Refusing to acknowledge the reality of trade with other countries might perhaps have an upside, but I certainly fail to see it.
It is a mystery.Still not clear what the practical downside would be of a "united states of europe".
For me I'd like to leave with a deal,if that should happen I'm really confident we'll be fine,
without one it's going to be tough for both of us, particularly for the smaller states in the EU but we were actually ok before the EU or as it was "the common market" so we can again.
Were that the case, you should support the campaign for the People's Vote. The 2016 referendum was just too incomplete, as well as too ambiguous far as its consequences go.The problem is democracy plain and simple.
In the abstract that sounds fine. But you should be careful about what you wish for. There seems to be a lot of mystification about what is possible in such deals and what they would entail.
I don't think that it is just lack of luck, good will or competence that made it so difficult for such a deal to be approved this far. On the contrary, I strongly suspect that if those who voted Leave were well informed and discussed the matter among themselves they would be very much divided internally and might well settle for Remain.
Which, I suppose, is my attempt at being nice while telling you not to be too attached to unicorn hunting.
Word has it that your economy was actually in terrible shape, and I see every indication that it is already taking a beating anew, but I suppose that it is your skin in the game. Mine is only indirectly affected.