Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No and no.I'm curious as to how many of you think that Donald trump and Hillary Clinton represent the best option for both parties after the conventions. Are these two the cream of the crop as far as the total potential candidates go?
You ignorant ferriner.I'm curious as to how many of you think that Donald trump and Hillary Clinton represent the best option for both parties after the conventions. Are these two the cream of the crop as far as the total potential candidates go?
It isn't????You ignorant ferriner.
You fail to understand that the nominating process is not about finding the best candidate.
Geeze Louise......it's like thinking the marathon is about finding the best weightlifter.
No, neither party has done a very good job (Hell, not even a decent job) of selecting candidates in the past several election cycles...in my opinion.I'm curious as to how many of you think that Donald trump and Hillary Clinton represent the best option for both parties after the conventions. Are these two the cream of the crop as far as the total potential candidates go?
Don't underestimate.No. I think they represent the worst both parties have to offer, which brings the question of how they both got the majority of their primary votes.
In Hillary's case, it was organization: even though Bernie motivated a lot of people, he lacked the organization that Hillary has developed over the past 16-24 years, even dominating the DNC apparatus. Ever since Bill got elected, I'm fairly certain that their joint aim has been to become the first spousal team of presidents in the US.No. I think they represent the worst both parties have to offer, which brings the question of how they both got the majority of their primary votes.
In an ideal world, we would've been looking at a Gary Johnson vs. Jill Stein election.
In an ideal world we'd have repurposed the two Conventions as places to execute both Hillary & Trump.In an ideal world, we would've been looking at a Gary Johnson vs. Jill Stein election.
Except that Sanders wasn't a Democrat when Billary let him run as one. I'm not sure he is one now, the proof is in the pudding. Can Sanders deliver enough voters to remain relevant to the Democrats?Well in the case of the Democrats, it is my opinion that the smart ones realized that the decision had been made that it was the Hillary's turn, that is all except Bernie,
You ignorant ferriner.
You fail to understand that the nominating process is not about finding the best candidate.
Geeze Louise......it's like thinking the marathon is about finding the best weightlifter.
Well in the case of the Democrats, it is my opinion that the smart ones realized that the decision had been made that it was the Hillary's turn, that is all except Bernie, and they wisely did not want to bring the wrath of the establishment down on them and ruin their chances for future considerations. .
Except that Sanders wasn't a Democrat when Billary let him run as one. I'm not sure he is one now, the proof is in the pudding. Can Sanders deliver enough voters to remain relevant to the Democrats?
Tom
But your statement has nothing to do with why only Hillary was running under the Democrats banner.
I assume you are joking when you implied that the Hillary "let" him, Sanders, run. But this goes to my point of why no other Democrat wanted (or was allowed ) to run.