• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

science and the bible

  1. questfortruth

    Weakness of God's proofs, and incompleteness theorem

    INTRODUCTION Colin McLarty, ``What does it take to prove Fermat's last theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory,'' Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16(3), 359-377 (2010). MY CONTRIBUTION \begin{abstract} I argue, that a good paper with good proof can contain weak spots. So the...
  2. questfortruth

    How many souls a person has in the Multiverse?

    ABSTRACT: There is a problem in quantum physics: a particle can be in two places at the same time. Why is not that particle an Omnipresent Spirit? How to restore the naturalism of nature? Because of this nonlocal omnipresence, Quantum Science fails to align with Einstein's purely materialistic...
  3. S

    Hello everyone... I'm called Soul Creator or God.

    Hey in called Scott Ryan in this life. I'm from the city of churches and can do premonitions....As crazy as that sounds I have proof of them. On Oblique weapons fb page I did an earthquake in America in an area and posted it on the day then the next day posted the medium 4.7 earthquake... Didn't...
  4. questfortruth

    Middle Ages God under scrutiny of XX century peers. Can peer-review be too peer?

    My SSRN paper and its discussion are here: Top science problems solved in top e-journal A reviewer might write: "But, let's take a very brief look at your work from your abstract in SSRN: That's interesting. You state that "they will never find" is a "testable prediction". How is that a...
  5. questfortruth

    Scientific Atheism in USSR

    MY MOTIVE OF POSTING: 1. I do not think, that things are perfectly good in our world, religions, science, philosophy, and society. 2. My "chief priest" in Moscow (Fr. Kirill) has given us all the commandment: to slow down the world falling into the abyss. I need to turn back the "Titanic" of...
  6. questfortruth

    A solution to information loss paradox in black holes

    POP-SCIENCE INTRODUCTION: MY IDEA: There are two levels of nature description: macro and micro. On the macro level, the paradox arises because any kind of stuff, which falls into Black Holes, ends up in the same outcome: the black body radiation spectrum of particles. Thus, at this level...
  7. questfortruth

    Is it good to mix Reason with Religion?

    I do not mix Science and Religion together. I mix Natural Theology and Religion. Science appears to be an anti-religious organization (for example, Darwin's Theory of Evolution has greatly reduced the number of members of the Church). Natural Theology studies nature as well, but welcomes and...
  8. questfortruth

    How paper with "God" word can pass peer-review in math-journal?

    ABSTRACT My result is bold enough: "No Millennium Problem solved yet because Perelman is wrong." But the paper includes part, where the word "God" is used. Can in today atheistic climate such banned word be used? In view of my Religion, the word "God" must be used even in the pure mathematics...
  9. questfortruth

    Science needs even toilet paper, much more God

    Different proofs for God are being discovered every year, but the proofs for the absence of God (proofs for atheism then) are lacking. My thesis, which I am substantiating here: The genius mathematician, who has proven in recent years the Millennium Prize Problem (the Russian national hero -...
  10. questfortruth

    Newton's Principia Has no Sense without Hand of God

    The Limits and infinitesimal numbers were invented by the fathers of Science like Newton and Leibniz. However, a hypothetical being from another star system could have developed more realistic mathematics [in my opinion the mathematics should be defined via numbers of our fingers and the actions...
  11. questfortruth

    Incompleteness of Science proves Truth Holder

    Introduction: My contribution: Suppose Dr. Gödel is wrong. In such case the probability to find [given unlimited research time and resources] the first way to prove the Riemann Hypothesis is perfect 100%. After that somebody will look for the second way to prove Riemann Hypothesis, like there...
  12. questfortruth

    Virtual Terms are "Hand of God"?

    Increasingly, we see phenomena that do not lead to the emergence of new experimentally confirmed theories or to the update of old theories acceptable to all scientists; an example is the (yet) futile search for Quantum Gravity and the Theory of Everything in an attempt to explain the...
  13. questfortruth

    Hand of God: Dark Matter

    One should include such a concept as virtual terms, i.e. mathematical insertions into the equations and laws of nature which could be made not from fundamental premises (like the least action principle) but "by hand" in order to fit the theory under observation. An example for such insertions...
  14. questfortruth

    Let them bang Big Bang: missing antimatter paradox solved!

    Dr. Christian Smorra comments the "missing antimatter paradox" as "All of our observations find a complete symmetry between matter and antimatter, which is why the universe should not actually exist. An asymmetry must exist here somewhere but we simply do not understand where the difference is...
  15. questfortruth

    God is not the Atheist, Probability of Abiogenesis

    Probability of Abiogenesis is (as calculated by Creationists) less than 0.000000000000000000000001 %, but not zero. Therefore, scientists use the Ockham's Razor and cut off the God from the picture, saying that the Abiogenesis has happened despite of low probability. Same way one can deal with...
  16. questfortruth

    Science fights the Religion

    Proof: 1. Scientists follow the methodological naturalism, i.e. Science looks only for god-less explanation of nature and the effects. The probability of Darwinism is near zero, but because it is not believed to be exactly zero, the Darwinism is Scientific. 2. Thus, Science is called to...
  17. questfortruth

    Science ran into Q-problem

    Q is a fictional character as well as the name of a race in Star Trek appearing in the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and Voyager series, as well as in related media. The most familiar Q is portrayed by John de Lancie. He is an extra-dimensional being of unknown origin who possesses...
  18. questfortruth

    Using Bible to kill the Bible?

    The existence of God is the common dogma among all religions. The original source of the concept of "God" is not godless, but religious literature. Therefore, the burden of proof of godlessness lies with the godless ones. Just to avoid trolling. If you use the word "God" and say that He is not...
  19. questfortruth

    Is God proven in Theism, for there is dogma of His Existence?

    To prove something means to demonstrate, that the God agrees with you, as the knowledge of a human is the knowledge, which holds his God. The God of Knowledge. To prove God to God is easy; and so, from the fact that God is proven for theists, and for atheists the God is not debunked, it follows...
  20. questfortruth

    Two Gods?!

    There are beings that God did not create: “you are not of God. Your father is the devil” (Bible), and if so, that is, two Gods. Doubting whether God exists is called agnosticism. It arose because of such a logical error: two fundamental Gods are taken for one God. Do not get confused: there...
Top