• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Increasingly, we see phenomena that do not lead to the emergence of new
experimentally confirmed theories or to the update of old theories
acceptable to all scientists; an example is the (yet) futile search for
Quantum Gravity and the Theory of Everything in an attempt to explain the
cosmological singularity and Black Holes. It should be expected then that
some known phenomena are explainable solely by the insertions of virtual
terms. They are mathematical insertions into the equations and laws of nature
which can be made not necessarily from fundamental premises (like the least action
principle) but "by hand'' in order to fit the theory under observation. An example
for such insertions are Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
Therefore, these cannot be directly detected, but it is possible to measure
their effect on nature. As a prime example, the Dark Matter anomaly has acted
on the space-time grid in such an amount that it created an additional force
of attraction of stars to the center of their galaxy. By the way, the proton
radius measured by many experimenters was different
in different years. This riddle did not find yet a solution.
Personally, I would solve this problem with a virtual insertion X
into the radius value, r = R + X.

More in: Mond Solves All Problems, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2004.0613
 
Top