Newton's Principia Has no Sense without Hand of God

[questfortruth]

The Limits and infinitesimal numbers were invented by the fathers of Science like Newton and Leibniz. However, a hypothetical being from another star system could have developed more realistic mathematics [in my opinion the mathematics should be defined via numbers of our fingers and the actions (like adding) with them]. In this note, I am showing the paradox of the current version of ``highest mathematics''.
As a solution to the problems I present modifications of formulas "by hand":

Newton's Principia of Natural Philosophy Has no Sense : viXra_revA

 

[Revoltingest]

Math consisting only of arithmetic applied to counting numbers?
Dang, that eliminates a whole lotta useful math.

 

[questfortruth]

Math consisting only of arithmetic applied to counting numbers?
Dang, that eliminates a whole lotta useful math.

But proves the Riemann Hypothesis.

 

[exchemist]

I notice this is too mad even for Vixra and has had to be published in a sort of ultra-loony, alternative vixra, if you can imagine such a thing.

 

[questfortruth]

I notice this is too mad even for Vixra and has had to be published in a sort of ultra-loony, alternative vixra, if you can imagine such a thing.

Nevertheless, the way has proven the Riemann Hypothesis.

 

[ChristineM]

The Limits and infinitesimal numbers were invented by the fathers of Science like Newton and Leibniz. However, a hypothetical being from another star system could have developed more realistic mathematics [in my opinion the mathematics should be defined via numbers of our fingers and the actions (like adding) with them]. In this note, I am showing the paradox of the current version of ``highest mathematics''.
As a solution to the problems I present modifications of formulas "by hand":

Newton's Principia of Natural Philosophy Has no Sense : viXra_revA

Number of fingers? Base 10 has-been used for thousands of years and is still the most common notation in maths

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

The Limits and infinitesimal numbers were invented by the fathers of Science like Newton and Leibniz. However, a hypothetical being from another star system could have developed more realistic mathematics [in my opinion the mathematics should be defined via numbers of our fingers and the actions (like adding) with them]. In this note, I am showing the paradox of the current version of ``highest mathematics''.
As a solution to the problems I present modifications of formulas "by hand":

Newton's Principia of Natural Philosophy Has no Sense : viXra_revA

Alas...

The brain-eating zombies must be out in overwhelming numbers...

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

I have a serious question: why do you call yourself @questfortruth when everything you write makes clear that truth is the very last thing you're interested in?

 

[questfortruth]

I have a serious question: why do you call yourself @questfortruth when everything you write makes clear that truth is the very last thing you're interested in?

Matthew 27:63 "Sir," they said, "we remember that while he was still alive that deceiver said, 'After three days I will rise again.'

 

[Polymath257]

But proves the Riemann Hypothesis.

I can tell the journals are clamoring to publish this 'proof'.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

 

[gnostic]

View attachment 40503

That’s funny, but it also happened to be true for most creationists.

 

[Kangaroo Feathers]

That’s funny, but it also happened to be true for most creationists.

And I'll be using it on Creationists I encounter from now on, too

 

[gnostic]

View attachment 40503

That’s funny, but it also happened to be true for most creationists.

And I'll be using it on Creationists I encounter from now on, too

That picture was already meant for creationists, wasn’t it?

Someone wrote recently about me, who cannot tell who is joking or who is telling sarcasm.

I cannot tell if you are being sarcastic now.

Oh! This is embarrassing.