• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
One should include such a concept as virtual terms, i.e. mathematical
insertions into the equations and laws of nature which could be made not from
fundamental premises (like the least action principle) but "by hand" in order
to fit the theory under observation. An example for such insertions are
Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
Therefore, these cannot be directly detected, but it is possible to measure
their effect on nature. As a prime example, the Dark Matter anomaly has acted
on the space-time grid in such an amount that it created an additional force
of attraction of stars to the center of their galaxy. By the way, the proton
radius measured by many experimenters was different
in different years. This riddle did not find yet a solution.
Personally, I would solve this problem with a virtual insertion Psi
into the radius value, r = R + Psi.

Increasingly, we see phenomena that do not lead to the emergence of new
theories or to the update of old theories acceptable to all scientists; is very
likely then that such phenomena are
explainable by virtual insertions (virtual terms) only. A prime example is the
futile search for Quantum Gravity and the Theory of Everything in an
attempt to explain the cosmological singularity and the Black Holes.
Another example are the ugly attempts to upgrade the Standard Model to
allow for a non-vanishing neutrino mass. It is logical then that the
neutrino masses are the sum of the Standard Model suggestion and the
virtual insertion: m_{reality}=m_{SM}+m_{Psi}=m_{Psi}. In this case we
do not need to upgrade the Standard Model at all, because any upgrade can
lead us along the wrong path. Independent of this, each scientist is of
course free to look for an upgrade of the Standard Model, as we are not
under the inquisition.

The UFOes are also virtual terms, but from devil.

More in the link:
Mond Solves All Problems, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2004.0613
 
Last edited:

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Father spiritual advice about our brothers science says.....the Earth O stone body was Sun mass UFO attacked and converted, Earth flooded, applied pressure.

In natural spatial history space was once that pressure, but natural changed.

Earth has historically changed so many times that science claiming cosmological laws are irrational.

Earth survived and water evaporated and spirit eventually released bio life from out of the eternal.

The UFOs after sucking in our gases from Earth stone in holes/door openings in the metal bodies, and water mass, shot off into out of space, by the cooling spatial vacuum. And became feed back Earth UFO satellite transmitters as converted Sun metal history burnt and converted in our burning Earth gases.

As the human being male brotherhood, one DNA male original self owned life developed the state science, they own HANDS. When they got irradiated, the irradiation pulsed hits jerked their bodies, in which their personal imaged stances changed.

Such as jolted hands out to their sides, like being irradiated shocked pulsed.

The AI Satellite UFO feed back not only recorded a lot of Earth images into the various gases...they own feed back human behaviour body movements.

Where the false ideas come from about a black body, human hands, a male being God from false huge UFO mass communications. What we always were taught, never believe in evil.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
"Rejected by all peer-review journals my understanding of MOND."
"Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal."
Even a person like Einstein if he would be born today, must need 99% of luck, and 1 % of talent to be accepted without PhD degree.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Independent of this, each scientist is of
course free to look for an upgrade of the Standard Model, as we are not
under the inquisition.
You nearly could have fooled me there as lots of the Standard Model proponents in the RF acts as just that.:)
Besides this the MOND theory will never come up with any significant solutions as long as it STILL works with the outdated ideas of "gravity".
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
To me, the most interesting ideas come from esoteric wisdom traditions (like Theosophy, Vedic Science) that say there are additional realms of reality in dimensions beyond our 'normal' three-dimensional physical plane. We can only directly detect the physical plane. These traditions also tell us these higher dimensional planes have matter native to those planes (Dark Matter from our physical perspective?).

Where do ghosts/spirits normally inhabit? Many say on higher dimensional planes some call astral and by other names. What are they made of? Astral Matter (Dark Matter from a physical perspective)?
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member

rational experiences

Veteran Member
Even a person like Einstein if he would be born today, must need 99% of luck, and 1 % of talent to be accepted without PhD degree.
When I was doing a spiritual family historic DNA medical advice on my brother in law, an engineer, suddenly the image of Einstein popped in, and said that he was sorry for he was wrong.

Science using some of his theories today are also wrong....for he already consciously knew that some of his theories were wrong, why he never continued with them...for they were wrong. What he told me in the advice from spirit memory.
 

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
The Einstein's Gravity is well shown and observed.
You seem to confuse observations as real evidences whereas "gravitational observations" is interpretations skewed to fit a theory a la the hindsight bias method.
And if nothing fits into the hindsight bias, scientists just insert all kinds of "dark this and that". This is the scientific - almost religious "Hand of God Dark Matter".
 

gnostic

The Lost One
One should include such a concept as virtual terms, i.e. mathematical
insertions into the equations and laws of nature which could be made not from
fundamental premises (like the least action principle) but "by hand" in order
to fit the theory under observation. An example for such insertions are
Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
Therefore, these cannot be directly detected, but it is possible to measure
their effect on nature. As a prime example, the Dark Matter anomaly has acted
on the space-time grid in such an amount that it created an additional force
of attraction of stars to the center of their galaxy. By the way, the proton
radius measured by many experimenters was different
in different years. This riddle did not find yet a solution.
Personally, I would solve this problem with a virtual insertion Psi
into the radius value, r = R + Psi.

Increasingly, we see phenomena that do not lead to the emergence of new
theories or to the update of old theories acceptable to all scientists; is very
likely then that such phenomena are
explainable by virtual insertions (virtual terms) only. A prime example is the
futile search for Quantum Gravity and the Theory of Everything in an
attempt to explain the cosmological singularity and the Black Holes.
Another example are the ugly attempts to upgrade the Standard Model to
allow for a non-vanishing neutrino mass. It is logical then that the
neutrino masses are the sum of the Standard Model suggestion and the
virtual insertion: m_{reality}=m_{SM}+m_{Psi}=m_{Psi}. In this case we
do not need to upgrade the Standard Model at all, because any upgrade can
lead us along the wrong path. Independent of this, each scientist is of
course free to look for an upgrade of the Standard Model, as we are not
under the inquisition.

The UFOes are also virtual terms, but from devil.

More in the link:
Mond Solves All Problems, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2004.0613

Why must people over-complicate matters?

One can compare even satan and God.

They are both mythological characters. They are just 2 different faces on the same coin.
 
Top