I can write a book of 500 pages, but I can not sell it. The paper is just one part of it.
Self publish on Amazon.
Told you this before, not sure why you ignore the obvious
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I can write a book of 500 pages, but I can not sell it. The paper is just one part of it.
Practical, technology, is based on PROVEN theoretical science. You are trying to rationalize your anti-science ideas. It's like saying chickens don't come from eggs.Disproof of THEORETICAL SCIENCE, not practical.
read your link...you are misunderstanding exactly what is 'wrong' and what it might imply...and if you can't show the math to prove what YOU are saying...
I have the strong feeling you should consider changing your handle. Something like "QuestforWoo" might be more appropriate. Because you are not looking for truth, you are seeking to prove truth impossible.Due to the Math is the language of Physics, but Hilbert's Second problem found a negative answer, the SCIENCE IS WRONG.
Read it in the file:
Yes, out of luck. But look around: Chernobyl meltdown of the reactor, Fukushima, airplane crashes, IPhones being burned in the pocket, and much more.
This was so intriguing that I had to take you off Ignore to find out what you are on about.
Self publish on Amazon.
Told you this before, not sure why you ignore the obvious
Due to the Math is the language of Physics, but Hilbert's Second problem found a negative answer, the SCIENCE IS WRONG.
Read it in the file:
Due to the Math is the language of Physics, but Hilbert's Second problem found a negative answer, the SCIENCE IS WRONG.
How many reactors are there around the world, functioning normally and producing immense amounts of power?Yes, out of luck. But look around: Chernobyl meltdown of the reactor, Fukushima, airplane crashes, IPhones being burned in the pocket, and much more.
I have the fix to all described problems in the file. Look section "Virtual Terms".
I can't help but wonder who the heck is "marking" these "papers."I looked. And this is what I found:
So, your fix is your "Virtual Term": M?
- The inconsistency of Science is fixable by adding Virtual Terms: look my research in Physics. For example, if from F(x) = 0 follows that x= 0, but needed was 5, then this contradiction becomes solved by adding a mathematical modification to solution:X=x+M= 0 + 5 = 5. Such modification is the Virtual Term. Then, the initial equation can become rewritten as well:F(x) =F(5). The Virtual Term is solution to all problems in Physics; currently there are: “cosmology crisis”, Dark Matter and Dark Energy without detected by detectors matter nor energy.
Hmmm, ....
I looked. And this is what I found:
So, your fix is your "Virtual Term": M?
- The inconsistency of Science is fixable by adding Virtual Terms: look my research in Physics. For example, if from F(x) = 0 follows that x= 0, but needed was 5, then this contradiction becomes solved by adding a mathematical modification to solution:X=x+M= 0 + 5 = 5. Such modification is the Virtual Term. Then, the initial equation can become rewritten as well:F(x) =F(5). The Virtual Term is solution to all problems in Physics; currently there are: “cosmology crisis”, Dark Matter and Dark Energy without detected by detectors matter nor energy.
Hmmm, ....
I can't help but wonder who the heck is "marking" these "papers."
didn't Einstein regret introducing a "cosmological constant" as a way to solve a problem he was having?
I couldn't really make heads or tails out of it.
Chernobyl meltdown of the reactor, Fukushima, airplane crashes, IPhones being burned in the pocket, and much more.
I have fix. I am the DOCTOR WHO.
I can write a book of 500 pages, but I can not sell it. The paper is just one part of it.
Self publish on Amazon.
Told you this before, not sure why you ignore the obvious