• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Disproof of all Science

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Due to the Math is the language of Physics, but Hilbert's Second problem found a negative answer, the SCIENCE IS WRONG.

Read it in the file:
I have the strong feeling you should consider changing your handle. Something like "QuestforWoo" might be more appropriate. Because you are not looking for truth, you are seeking to prove truth impossible.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Due to the Math is the language of Physics, but Hilbert's Second problem found a negative answer, the SCIENCE IS WRONG.

"You stare into your high definition plasma screen monitor in the comfort of your air conditioned home and in the glow of electric lighting, type into your cordless keyboard then hit enter, which causes your computer to convert all that visual data into a binary signal that's processed by millions of precise circuits.

"This is then converted to a frequency modulated signal to reach your wireless router where it is then converted to light waves and sent along a large fiber optics cable to be processed by a super computer on a mass server.

"This sends that bit you typed to a satellite orbiting the earth that was put there through the greatest feats of engineering and science, all so it could go back through a similar pathway to make it all the way here to my computer monitor 15,000 miles away from you just so you could say,
"Science is all a bunch of man-made hogwash."- anon

Sorry, but you have no argument. You made no argument.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Yes, out of luck. But look around: Chernobyl meltdown of the reactor, Fukushima, airplane crashes, IPhones being burned in the pocket, and much more.
How many reactors are there around the world, functioning normally and producing immense amounts of power?
How many flights are taken every day, with no trouble at all, getting millions and millions of people to destinations all over the world? How many iPhones are there out there, do you suppose, that are doing exactly what they're supposed to do, day after day, with no trouble at all?

The answer to all those questions, by the way, is an immense number of the products of our science doing good everywhere on earth, and a really, really tiny number of failures because, after all, while the SCIENCE is right, human technology can never be perfect, because it's the product of human engineering.
 

Terry Sampson

Well-Known Member
I have the fix to all described problems in the file. Look section "Virtual Terms".

I looked. And this is what I found:
  • The inconsistency of Science is fixable by adding Virtual Terms: look my research in Physics. For example, if from F(x) = 0 follows that x= 0, but needed was 5, then this contradiction becomes solved by adding a mathematical modification to solution:X=x+M= 0 + 5 = 5. Such modification is the Virtual Term. Then, the initial equation can become rewritten as well:F(x) =F(5). The Virtual Term is solution to all problems in Physics; currently there are: “cosmology crisis”, Dark Matter and Dark Energy without detected by detectors matter nor energy.
So, your fix is your "Virtual Term": M?

Hmmm, ....
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I looked. And this is what I found:
  • The inconsistency of Science is fixable by adding Virtual Terms: look my research in Physics. For example, if from F(x) = 0 follows that x= 0, but needed was 5, then this contradiction becomes solved by adding a mathematical modification to solution:X=x+M= 0 + 5 = 5. Such modification is the Virtual Term. Then, the initial equation can become rewritten as well:F(x) =F(5). The Virtual Term is solution to all problems in Physics; currently there are: “cosmology crisis”, Dark Matter and Dark Energy without detected by detectors matter nor energy.
So, your fix is your "Virtual Term": M?

Hmmm, ....
I can't help but wonder who the heck is "marking" these "papers."

Oh, and by the way, didn't Einstein regret introducing a "cosmological constant" as a way to solve a problem he was having?
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I looked. And this is what I found:
  • The inconsistency of Science is fixable by adding Virtual Terms: look my research in Physics. For example, if from F(x) = 0 follows that x= 0, but needed was 5, then this contradiction becomes solved by adding a mathematical modification to solution:X=x+M= 0 + 5 = 5. Such modification is the Virtual Term. Then, the initial equation can become rewritten as well:F(x) =F(5). The Virtual Term is solution to all problems in Physics; currently there are: “cosmology crisis”, Dark Matter and Dark Energy without detected by detectors matter nor energy.
So, your fix is your "Virtual Term": M?

Hmmm, ....

I couldn't really make heads or tails out of it.

 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Chernobyl meltdown of the reactor, Fukushima, airplane crashes, IPhones being burned in the pocket, and much more.

None of these is a failure of science. The failures of government and industry don't reflect on science.

What is your religion doing to solve the world's problems and improve the human condition? (No response is necessary. That's a rhetorical question to which I already know the answer)
 
Top