mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
send them to live with all you liberals.
Take 2:
That is not a solution, because you can't actually do it. What is your realistic solution?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
send them to live with all you liberals.
Maybe so, but have you ever seen what a "kid" is an effective killing machine? Not saying that all of those crossing the boarders fit into that class, but a "kid" can kill you just a fast as an adult. Every hear of MS-13, many of them are "kids".I tend to give kids a pass on that one. They don't have a choice in the matter. I might not use iillegal but I'd say displaced might be a better term for the kids. Adults of course need to be called for what it is. Illegal.
Maybe so, but have you ever seen what a "kid" is an effective killing machine? Not saying that all of those crossing the boarders fit into that class, but a "kid" can kill you just a fast as an adult. Every hear of MS-13, many of them are "kids".
In other words I don't give "kids" a pass, just because they are not considered an adult.
So paranoid, angry and scared. The science of the conservative brain.Maybe so, but have you ever seen what a "kid" is an effective killing machine? Not saying that all of those crossing the boarders fit into that class, but a "kid" can kill you just a fast as an adult. Every hear of MS-13, many of them are "kids".
In other words I don't give "kids" a pass, just because they are not considered an adult.
Does not your far left frontal lobe realize if they are illegal aliens they have already broken the law, hence their crime rate is 100%So paranoid, angry and scared. The science of the conservative brain.
Isn't it true illegal immigrants have lower crime rates than citizens?
Your fear of a tiny percentage of immigrants is noted. This reminds me of banning muslims because you fear a few may be terrorists.
All while ignoring the real threat in America.
Your far-right newsmakers exploit the fear given to you at birth. On purpose.
I'd assume most get deported. But you can believe whatever you think is happening.Does not your far left frontal lobe realize if they are illegal aliens they have already broken the law, hence their crime rate is 100%
I'd assume most get deported. But you can believe whatever you think is happening.
Most of these children were showing up at the border claiming asylum, which is legal. Coming up from central America.
Your statistics are faulty. Symptom of radical-right newsmaker intake.
I have a new avatar for you
Hmmm, I guess "kids-in-cages" when Trump was president is different when the Biden administration reopens the same facilities. Then again maybe words make a difference.
WH denies 'kids in cages' hypocrisy as detention centers reopen
White House defends reopening of facility for migrant kids
WaPo called out for report on Biden's 'migrant facility for children' after hitting Trump's 'kids in cages'
Ocasio-Cortez criticizes opening of migrant facility for children under Biden
The motivations of both couldn't be more different. In Trump's case, it was politically motivated as he repeatedly exclaimed that he did it to "send a message". In Biden's case, this is not the motive, as trying to adequately deal with this influx in a humane way through trying to link them up with other relatives if they can't find the parents is what they're doing.In another thread, someone asked us to imagine how much worse another term of Trump could be. I asked what would be the worst thing that could be expected from another term of Trump and the answer that came back was the separation of children from their parents at the border.
Biden's response to throw out Trump policies and build more containment facilities for children stands as a stark rebuttal of that position. There are now thousands of unattended children at the border. Not only is it a total disgrace. But the wholesale removal of Trump policies clearly, directly contributes to this ever-growing, ever-worsening situation. To wit, the situation at the border would've been better under another term of Trump.
@Mr Spinkles
The motivations of both couldn't be more different. In Trump's case, it was politically motivated as he repeatedly exclaimed that he did it to "send a message". In Biden's case, this is not the motive, as trying to adequately deal with this influx in a humane way through trying to link them up with other relatives if they can't find the parents is what they're doing.
Thus, even in a court of law, "intent" is often very important to consider, and judges often take that into consideration.
Nope.motivated actions to revoke Trump policies?
Biden has long been known, including by many congressional Republicans, as being a man of true compassion. Lindsey Graham and Meghan McCain have publicly attested to that.If not, then what was Biden's motivation?
Heaven forbid-- and It did.What do you think would've happened in another term of Trump? Do you think there would be more or less unattended children?
It's also evidenced by his 1984 Crime Bill that put so manyNope.
Biden has long been known, including by many congressional Republicans, as being a man of true compassion.
There has been an upswing of children especially going north to the border and, granted, it probably would have been less under Trump.
Biden has long been known, including by many congressional Republicans, as being a man of true compassion. Lindsey Graham and Meghan McCain have publicly attested to that.
Not for those children seeking asylum. To ignore their plight is 100% unethical, imo.We agree! The border situation would've been better under Trump!
This has nothing to do with what I posted.Lindsey Graham: Children crossing border 'could easily be terrorists'
This has nothing to do with what I posted.Meghan McCain Snipes at 'The View' Co-Hosts Over Biden's Border Policy
This has nothing to do with what I posted.The View’ host Meghan McCain salutes AOC for trying to free kids at border
If you believe that this is what I was doing, then please put me on your "ignore list".What words would I use to describe it when a person rejects policies simply because they were put in place while a particular person he didn't like was in charge... hmmm, oh, that's right, "blind hate".
Not for those children seeking asylum. To ignore their plight is 100% unethical, imo.
This has nothing to do with what I posted.
This has nothing to do with what I posted.
This has nothing to do with what I posted.
Biden has long been known, including by many congressional Republicans, as being a man of true compassion. Lindsey Graham and Meghan McCain have publicly attested to that.
If you believe that this is what I was doing, then please put me on your "ignore list".
Who said this? They are being vetted.IMO, granting asylum without examination can lead to unethical behavior.
You made a claim that Lindsey Graham and Meghan McCain attested to Biden being a man of "true compassion".
The first one deals with Biden's moral character, but the second one deals with policy differences.So I posted for you what Lindsey Graham and Meghan McCain have stated recently about Biden on the particular issue of this thread. It is, thus, directly relevant
Yes, I well know what racism and xenophobia looks like, and both are today what is driving the Republican Party. Thomas Friedman put it this way: "90% of Republicans are racists, and the other 10% are racists". Yes, that's obviously hyperbole, but then it ain't that far from the truth based on my experiences and what we are repeatedly hearing and seeing. I grew up as a Republican in a Republican family, but the blatant racism I repeatedly encountered appalled me to the point of only rarely voting for a Republican since the late-1960's.I hope that you now have a clearer picture of what congressional republicans, in general, actually think about Biden's policy on illegal immigration.
Because if you think my thingy is lying, then you might as well just not converse with me because you could never believe what I post.? You want me to ignore you? ? Why?
And Democrats are better? The party founded for the purposeYes, I well know what racism and xenophobia looks like, and both are today what is driving the Republican Party. Thomas Friedman put it this way: "90% of Republicans are racists, and the other 10% are racists". Yes, that's obviously hyperbole, but then it ain't that far from the truth based on my experiences and what we are repeatedly hearing and seeing. I grew up as a Republican in a Republican family, but the blatant racism I repeatedly encountered appalled me to the point of only rarely voting for a Republican since the late-1960's.
Who said this? They are being vetted.
The first one deals with Biden's moral character, but the second one deals with policy differences.
Yes, I well know what racism and xenophobia looks like, and both are today what is driving the Republican Party. Thomas Friedman put it this way: "90% of Republicans are racists, and the other 10% are racists". Yes, that's obviously hyperbole, but then it ain't that far from the truth based on my experiences and what we are repeatedly hearing and seeing. I grew up as a Republican in a Republican family, but the blatant racism I repeatedly encountered appalled me to the point of only rarely voting for a Republican since the late-1960's.
Because if you think my thingy is lying, then you might as well just not converse with me because you could never believe what I post.
Either way, this terminates my participation on this as I have more important things to attend to.