• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why did Obama have such a poor record regarding religious persecution in the world

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Obama had a bad record all around regarding religious persecution

You're linked articles basically suggested he was a shill for Islam.
So...I'm still confused.

Also, Jewish reports of issues within the US have been on the rise.
 
Last edited:

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
It was the Bush administration that is responsible for ISIS.

From: Did George W. Bush Create ISIS?
Did George W. Bush Create ISIS?

By Dexter Filkins

May 15, 2015


Dexter-Did-George-W-Bush-Create-ISIS.jpg

Photograph by James Glover/Reuters

The exchange started like this: at the end of Jeb Bush’s town-hall meeting in Reno, Nevada, on Wednesday, a college student named Ivy Ziedrich stood up and said that she had heard Bush blame the growth of isis on President Obama, in particular on his decision to withdraw American troops from Iraq in 2011. The origins of isis, Ziedrich said, lay in the decision by Bush’s brother, in 2003, to disband the Iraqi Army following the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s government.

“It was when thirty thousand individuals who were part of the Iraqi military were forced out—they had no employment, they had no income, and they were left with access to all of the same arms and weapons.… Your brother created isis,’’ she said.

“All right,’’ Bush said. “Is that a question?”

“You don’t need to be pedantic to me, sir,” she said.

“Pedantic? Wow,” Bush said.

Ziedrich finally came forth with her query: “Why are you saying that isis was created by us not having a presence in the Middle East when it’s pointless wars, where we send young American men to die for the idea of American exceptionalism? Why are you spouting nationalist rhetoric to get us involved in more wars?”

Jeb replied by repeating his earlier criticism of President Obama: that Iraq had been stable until American troops had departed. “When we left Iraq, security had been arranged,” Bush said. The removal of American troops had created a security vacuum that isis exploited. “The result was the opposite occurred. Immediately, that void was filled.”

“Your brother created isis” is the kind of sound bite that grabs our attention, because it’s obviously false yet oddly rings true. Bush didn’t like it: he offered a retort and then left the stage. Meanwhile, Ziedrich had started a conversation that rippled across Twitter, Facebook, and any number of American dinner tables. Who is actually right?

Here is what happened: In 2003, the U.S. military, on orders of President Bush, invaded Iraq, and nineteen days later threw out Saddam’s government. A few days after that, President Bush or someone in his Administration decreed the dissolution of the Iraqi Army. This decision didn’t throw “thirty thousand individuals” out of a job, as Ziedrich said—the number was closer to ten times that. Overnight, at least two hundred and fifty thousand Iraqi men—armed, angry, and with military training—were suddenly humiliated and out of work.

This was probably the single most catastrophic decision of the American venture in Iraq. In a stroke, the Administration helped enable the creation of the Iraqi insurgency. Bush Administration officials involved in the decision—like Paul Bremer and Walter Slocombe—argued that they were effectively ratifying the reality that the Iraqi Army had already disintegrated.

This was manifestly not true. I talked to American military commanders who told me that leaders of entire Iraqi divisions (a division has roughly ten thousand troops) had come to them for instructions and expressed a willingness to coöperate. In fact, many American commanders argued vehemently at the time that the Iraqi military should be kept intact—that disbanding it would turn too many angry young men against the United States. But the Bush White House went ahead.
There is more than enough blame to go around. The seeds may have been planted by Bush, but Obama's withdrawal allowed them to grow.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
There is more than enough blame to go around. The seeds may have been planted by Bush, but Obama's withdrawal allowed them to grow.

Obama's actions were based on faulty CIA intelligence when he took office.. Nonetheless the military and government was decimated by the actions of Bush, and Iraq was unable to deal with ISIS regardless.

My main point in this thread is to deal with the attempt to hang the guilt trip on Obama. If you wish to consider the history there is blamed shared by all.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Obama's actions were based on faulty CIA intelligence when he took office.. Nonetheless the military and government was decimated by the actions of Bush, and Iraq was unable to deal with ISIS regardless.

My main point in this thread is to deal with the attempt to hang the guilt trip on Obama. If you wish to consider the history there is blamed shared by all.

As far as responsible use of intelligence by Obama/Hillary, Bengazi says otherwise.
And actually Obama had really eccentric ideas about religious persecution


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5eef9ddbfc1c

Critics pounce after Obama talks Crusades, slavery at prayer breakfast
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
As far as responsible use of intelligence by Obama/Hillary, Bengazi says otherwise.
And actually Obama had really eccentric ideas about religious persecution


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5eef9ddbfc1c

Critics pounce after Obama talks Crusades, slavery at prayer breakfast

My point still stands against those that selectively demonize Obama, like you, and not realize the continuum of the Presidents responsibility, along with the general cultural issues of the USA. The bottom line remains Bush is responsible for the rise and power of ISIS as cited.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member

sooda

Veteran Member
Seems there was much more concern shown before him and after him.

There was even a severe increase in harm against Christians and moderate Muslims in the middle east on his watch but he had a very weak policy and response

Why was that? and why did the Democratic party go along with it?

It was because of the invasion of Iraq which made Iran ascendant and created groups like ISIS?
 

Curious George

Veteran Member
Seems there was much more concern shown before him and after him.

There was even a severe increase in harm against Christians and moderate Muslims in the middle east on his watch but he had a very weak policy and response

Why was that? and why did the Democratic party go along with it?
I am a little confused. It seems that you are suggesting that our foreign policy should ve based entirely on humanitarian concerns. Is that what you mean to imply?
 

ManSinha

Well-Known Member

ManSinha

Well-Known Member
It was because of the invasion of Iraq which made Iran ascendant and created groups like ISIS?

There are independent analyses that the US did the work for Iran - getting rid of the only local power that acted as a check on them leaving them free to continue with their religious political expansionist plans for fighting proxy wars by their support of Hezbollah and the like

It is was GWB and Cheney that got suckered into this - Obama was nowhere on the scene

You can start the discussion with Obama if you like but please take a moment and answer the question posed as to the incorrect actions and patently false pronouncements of his predecessor - i am of the opinion that Bush should be charged with crimes against humanity for sending US service men and women to their deaths needlessly over an 18 year period.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
There are independent analyses that the US did the work for Iran - getting rid of the only local power that acted as a check on them leaving them free to continue with their religious political expansionist plans for fighting proxy wars by their support of Hezbollah and the like

It is was GWB and Cheney that got suckered into this - Obama was nowhere on the scene

You can start the discussion with Obama if you like but please take a moment and answer the question posed as to the incorrect actions and patently false pronouncements of his predecessor - i am of the opinion that Bush should be charged with crimes against humanity for sending US service men and women to their deaths needlessly over an 18 year period.

There is no excuse for what they did. Everyone with any knowledge of the ME or the oil business knew the invasion would be an unmitigated disaster.
 

Salvador

RF's Swedenborgian
Bizzaro assumption! If anything Trump could care less.

Of course, I'm not assuming Trump actually cares more about Christianity or Judaism than how much President Obama did so; However, Trump has made symbolic gestures supporting Christianity like appointing a deeply devout Christian as V.P. and moving the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. At least Trump pretends to care about Christianity in order to gain their much needed Christian political support, which President Obama didn't require so much.
 
Last edited:
Top