Our end was written back in the late 70s when Milton Friedman declared 'greed is good' and we all nodded our heads in assent. At that moment we gave the wealthiest and already overly powerful elite in this country permission to do whatever it took to amass as much wealth and power as they possibly could, regardless of how it effected anyone else. And the rest of us have accepted their resulting abuse and exploitation dutifully ever since. ... Because we believe greed is good.
I think this pretty much cuts to the core issue of what is ailing America. I recall back during the 1980s, the theme song of the Republicans was "Don't Worry, Be Happy," but there were some who could see the writing on the wall and knew that we were heading down the wrong path. It's almost like the whole country (or most of it) became zombified during the Reagan era, entranced by consumerism and mollified by shiny objects.
It was still "democratic" in the sense that people's votes were counted and there were elections conducted in such a way that one could have good reason to believe that the vote counts were being reported accurately. Although it's not always the case. Close elections might cause some squabbles, as has been the case in the past. Claims of "ballot box stuffing" aren't exactly new.
One safety feature we have is that Presidents are only limited to two terms. If ever that stops being the case, then that will be the sign that we're really in trouble. But the President is just one person heading up the entire Executive Branch of government, which itself is a huge organization. I remember a quote attributed to J. Edgar Hoover that "it doesn't matter who becomes President. Presidents and Senators come and go, visitors to Washington. I'm a resident." Nobody actually elected him, yet he somehow wielded a certain degree of power within the government.
Then there's also been questionable activities of the CIA, NSA, the military - all in the name of national interests and national security. We're making the world safe for democracy. But a militaristic, quasi-nationalistic government which has a culture of intense secrecy is, at best, a hobbled democracy. This is especially true since the people are often denied information or given limited information about what the government is actually doing. Even the President or Congress may not always know.
This has had the effect of making people believe that this is all okay, because it's all for our own interests. Of course, there are some who would openly admit that our government has done some very bad things, but in the end, we've been somewhat more restrained than the fascists or the communist regimes. We never thought of ourselves as
that bad, even if some people tend to overuse extremist terms to describe their opponents. But we have made
some moral compromises, and in doing so, we've risked the possibility of sliding down that slippery slope towards outright fascism.
With the kind of ideas which have been prevalent in our political culture - including the patriotic and quasi-nationalistic bent which is conditioned to accept the idea that it's okay to cross the line on occasion as long as it's done for freedom, it shouldn't really be any great surprise that there might be a growing number of people who want to amp it up and take it to the next level.
The only way to really deal with it is acknowledge the flaws in our own culture and political system which led us to this, but instead, people seem to want do everything but that. Because we don't want to admit that we made any mistakes or that some aspects of our worldview might be erroneous. We created a monster which has gotten out of control.
One thing that might help a great deal is to change the culture in how information is disseminated and made available to the public. The best way to counter lies is to tell the straight truth, but it should also be transparent, adding and withholding nothing. But a lot of times, information is withheld from public view, oftentimes for reasons of national security. Sometimes evidence and information is released selectively and it may be some time before all the facts are known before someone can make a reasonable conclusion. Then there are other things which can be mere annoyances, such as paywalls or having to pay to get access to some academic articles and reports. I realize that we live in a capitalist system and we all have to make money, but it does no good to tell ignorant people to "study and read the facts" when they may not necessarily have the time or the money to pay for it. They're going to look for something easier to access.
Maybe if some of these news organizations and academic institutions truly wish to save democracy, then perhaps they need to bite the bullet, remove the paywalls and other money-driven barriers, and make their information more freely available to the general public. If only to counter all the BS out there. America needs them to stop being greedy capitalists, if only just for a little while.