Spartan
Well-Known Member
Your choice.
Regards Tony
I want to know what you think. Is Mithra Christ also?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your choice.
Regards Tony
I want to know what you think. Is Mithra Christ also?
You're wrong. That's poor scholarship to claim that.
I have no opinion on Mithra, I have never looked into it.
Christ tell us how to look for the fruits of the Spirit, thus it again comes back to your choice.
Edit: A quick look, my answer is no.
What is important is this age, is why have we rejected the Messiah?
Regards Tony
In your opinion.Why Israel Missed its Messiah
From my studies over the decades, there are only two places I know of in the Old Testament that predict / prophesy when the Messiah will appear in history. The first of these is documented in a separate article on my website written by Chuck Missler (From his Book “The Creator Beyond Time and Space”)
Until Shiloh Comes
The prophecy, generally stated, is this, from Genesis chapter 49:
“The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh comes; and to him shall be the obedience of the people.” Genesis 49:10 (NKJ)
This strange prophecy has a few words that need to be defined in order to be fully understood. The word “scepter” has been understood by the Rabbis to mean the “tribal staff” or “tribal identity” of the twelve tribes of Israel. This “tribal identity” was linked, in the minds of the Jews, to their right to apply and enforce Mosaic law upon the people, including the right to adjudicate capital cases and administer capital punishment, or jus gladii (The jus gladii is a legal term which refers to the legal authority to adjudicate capital cases and impose capital punishment.)
Secondly, it is well documented that the word “Shiloh” has been understood for millennia to be an idiom for the Messiah. Therefore, according to this prophecy, the tribal identity or scepter of the tribe of Judah would not cease until the Messiah came. The article goes on to conclude that the time called for the Messiah to appear is the first century – when Jesus did appear.
The second place in scripture that indicates when the Messiah would appear is Daniel chapter 9, verses 24-27. And again, the time it indicates for the appearance of the Messiah is the first century – in 32 AD. Exactly when Jesus rode into Jerusalem as the Jewish Messiah. Here is the background on that prophecy:
DANIEL'S 70 WEEKS PROPHECY
Both prophecies about the time of the appearance of the Messiah predict the 1st century - the time of Jesus. No other religion has this prophetic signature.
Why Israel Missed its Messiah
From my studies over the decades, there are only two places I know of in the Old Testament that predict / prophesy when the Messiah will appear in history. The first of these is documented in a separate article on my website written by Chuck Missler (From his Book “The Creator Beyond Time and Space”)
Until Shiloh Comes
The prophecy, generally stated, is this, from Genesis chapter 49:
“The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh comes; and to him shall be the obedience of the people.” Genesis 49:10 (NKJ)
This strange prophecy has a few words that need to be defined in order to be fully understood. The word “scepter” has been understood by the Rabbis to mean the “tribal staff” or “tribal identity” of the twelve tribes of Israel. This “tribal identity” was linked, in the minds of the Jews, to their right to apply and enforce Mosaic law upon the people, including the right to adjudicate capital cases and administer capital punishment, or jus gladii (The jus gladii is a legal term which refers to the legal authority to adjudicate capital cases and impose capital punishment.)
Secondly, it is well documented that the word “Shiloh” has been understood for millennia to be an idiom for the Messiah. Therefore, according to this prophecy, the tribal identity or scepter of the tribe of Judah would not cease until the Messiah came. The article goes on to conclude that the time called for the Messiah to appear is the first century – when Jesus did appear.
The second place in scripture that indicates when the Messiah would appear is Daniel chapter 9, verses 24-27. And again, the time it indicates for the appearance of the Messiah is the first century – in 32 AD. Exactly when Jesus rode into Jerusalem as the Jewish Messiah. Here is the background on that prophecy:
DANIEL'S 70 WEEKS PROPHECY
Both prophecies about the time of the appearance of the Messiah predict the 1st century - the time of Jesus. No other religion has this prophetic signature.
One must look into biblical prophecy to make such an observation. It is not a matter of convenience.
The day for a year principal was used by Biblical Scholars well before the Bab and Baha'u'llah gave their Messages as you can research at this link; Day-year principle - Wikipedia It was first used in Christian exposition in 380 AD by Ticonius.
There is no stronger prophecy for any Messenger in any other Holy Books than this prophecy. With this timeline, we also prove Muhammad was foretold in the Old and New Testaments.
Regards Tony
This prophecy records the entire dispensation of Muhammad and records the year when all things would be made new. The Message of the Bab closed the age of Muhammed in the year 1260, thus fulfilling those specific prophecies.
The Message of Muhammad found life again in the Message of Baha'u'llah.
The rejection of Muhammad was for the entire dispensation that closed in the year 1260, the Covenant was broken and Ali was rejected as the rightfully appointed successor.
Daniel comes to 1260 via the edict to rebuild the temple of 457BC and the 2300 years before the sanctuary was again cleansed. 2300-457+1 (as no year 0) = AD1844, or AH1260.
Regards Tony
Why Israel Missed its Messiah
From my studies over the decades, there are only two places I know of in the Old Testament that predict / prophesy when the Messiah will appear in history. The first of these is documented in a separate article on my website written by Chuck Missler (From his Book “The Creator Beyond Time and Space”)
Until Shiloh Comes
The prophecy, generally stated, is this, from Genesis chapter 49:
“The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh comes; and to him shall be the obedience of the people.” Genesis 49:10 (NKJ)
This strange prophecy has a few words that need to be defined in order to be fully understood. The word “scepter” has been understood by the Rabbis to mean the “tribal staff” or “tribal identity” of the twelve tribes of Israel. This “tribal identity” was linked, in the minds of the Jews, to their right to apply and enforce Mosaic law upon the people, including the right to adjudicate capital cases and administer capital punishment, or jus gladii (The jus gladii is a legal term which refers to the legal authority to adjudicate capital cases and impose capital punishment.)
Secondly, it is well documented that the word “Shiloh” has been understood for millennia to be an idiom for the Messiah. Therefore, according to this prophecy, the tribal identity or scepter of the tribe of Judah would not cease until the Messiah came. The article goes on to conclude that the time called for the Messiah to appear is the first century – when Jesus did appear.
The second place in scripture that indicates when the Messiah would appear is Daniel chapter 9, verses 24-27. And again, the time it indicates for the appearance of the Messiah is the first century – in 32 AD. Exactly when Jesus rode into Jerusalem as the Jewish Messiah. Here is the background on that prophecy:
DANIEL'S 70 WEEKS PROPHECY
Both prophecies about the time of the appearance of the Messiah predict the 1st century - the time of Jesus. No other religion has this prophetic signature.
Well, that's your belief.
Yes that is so and It proved that my Faith is not built upon a matter of convenience, as you suggested.
Regards Tony
I have not been following this conversation very closely, but I just wanted to mention that the year 1844 is not just a Baha'i belief. Christian scholars of the 19th century were also expecting the return of Christ in that year, so apparently they did the same math; but when the physical body of Jesus did not come down out of the clouds with trumpets and angels, they took their ascension robes and went home.Yes that is so and It proved that my Faith is not built upon a matter of convenience, as you suggested.
Regards Tony
No one would believe that "Faith is built upon a matter of convenience" as you said. Dont take these things so personally. Alright, lets discuss this.
I asked you a question. Does all mentions of Day or Himera as in revelations mean a year?
And it was a notorious year in Christianity precisely for the reason that Jesus did NOT return. It is referred to as the "Great Disappointment."I have not been following this conversation very closely, but I just wanted to mention that the year 1844 is not just a Baha'i belief. Christian scholars of the 19th century were also expecting the return of Christ in that year, so apparently they did the same math; but when the physical body of Jesus did not come down out of the clouds with trumpets and angels, they took their ascension robes and went home.
THIS is actual history that can me verified, as it was in newspapers of the time.
We can't miss someone who hasn't come.
Dont take these things so personally.
I have not been following this conversation very closely, but I just wanted to mention that the year 1844 is not just a Baha'i belief. Christian scholars of the 19th century were also expecting the return of Christ in that year, so apparently they did the same math; but when the physical body of Jesus did not come down out of the clouds with trumpets and angels, they took their ascension robes and went home.
THIS is actual history that can me verified, as it was in newspapers of the time.
Yet Christians will keep pushing back the date forever.And it was a notorious year in Christianity precisely for the reason that Jesus did NOT return. It is referred to as the "Great Disappointment."
And it was a notorious year in Christianity precisely for the reason that Jesus did NOT return. It is referred to as the "Great Disappointment."
Because they made it so figurative that it was not recognizable.For a few, who all gave their lives, they found the promise was fulfilled.
Regards Tony