sooda
Veteran Member
The Arabs didn't write a great deal down. Other than the Quran, it is the best part of 2 centuries before we get many Arabic texts appearing. As a result not a great deal is known as much of the "history" that appeared in the 8th/9th C is more like theology and should be no more taken at face value than the historicity of events described in the Bible.
We do know that many Christians and Jews were involved in the "Muslim" conquests though, as this is noted in non-Muslim sources.
In addition, the people who were conquered in the decades after Muhammad's death didn't really know that their conquerors had a new religion, so the idea that there were mass forced conversions is obviously false. It's also debatable whether they even had a new religion at this point. Muhammad was definitely seen as a prophet, and certainly had some specific teachings, but it's a bit the the question of when Christianity gained a reified identity outside of Judaism which is open to much dispute.
In general the Arabs just asked for tribute from conquered people and left them to run their own affairs. There likely wouldn't have been much tangible difference for most people, their gold was just going to Arabs instead of Romans of Persians.
It is also possible that non-Arabs were given greater religious leeway than Arabs though.
Back up and study some history of the Levant and the middle east.
Well done.