After informing you of my views, you continue misrepresenting them.I didn't.
This is abusive, & very much against the spirit of RF.
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
After informing you of my views, you continue misrepresenting them.I didn't.
After informing you of my views, you continue misrepresenting them.
This is abusive, & very much against the spirit of RF.
I just quoted your entire post, as you've previously demanded.You intentionally quote me out of context...
Trump was right about that. Unlike people who believe
their own side is without sin, & the other is pure evil, he
grokked diversity on both sides. To deny this is bigotry.
Whooda thunk that a boor like Trump would be the one
to actually be more tolerant than the left?
Good is what I value.Yeah, now you only have to decide without an agenda and don't use apologetics, but rather come up with the productive and correct definitions of good/without sin and bad/pure evil. And you can do that, right? You don't have any agenda at all, right?
Good is what I value.
Evil is what I oppose.
Buy this standard, I find both good & evil on both sides.
I didn't intend it to be that comprehensive.That is without any meaning in practice because you haven't described what you find the one and the other.
I didn't intend it to be that comprehensive.
But I answered the query you asked.
My values: Libertarian
I won't be giving a comprehensive list of all my values.That is still meaningless...
I won't be giving a comprehensive list of all my values.
You're awfully demanding, yet not so forthcoming about
why, or your own values. It doesn't seem like a discussion.
I see your trick...So you make a claim of good and bad, that you don't want to defend. Okay.
I see your trick...
Make a mischievous claim about my intent in order to provoke.
I'm not here to provide you with extensive lists.
("Libertarian" describes my values, & answered
your question.) I prefer conversation.
You may ask more specific questions, or you
may offer your own opinions, & we'll discuss them.
But you'll have no success with unreasonably
broad demands that seem to lead nowhere.
Yes.Okay, can a government be any good?
Yes.Can taxes be any good?
Yes.Is any form of government control over a limited part of the economy be good?
Typically, that is assumed by government & charities.Who in the end has the responsibility of those, who can't take care of themselves?
There can be.Are there a difference between morality and the legal?
Limits upon what government is allowed to do to us.What are rights?
Impositions upon one, whether taken on oneself or imposed byWhat are duties?
You're the Energizer Bunny of queries.Can all human behavior be done as an economical value?
Who do we make laws?
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Typically, that is assumed by government & charities.
There can be.
Limits upon what government is allowed to do to us.
Impositions upon one, whether taken on oneself or imposed by
others. There will be questions about how far the latter goes.
You're the Energizer Bunny of queries.
Instead of question after question, with no discussion,
why not start a discussion. This isn't interesting.
That belief doesn't make them bad.Are the around 70% of Republicans who believe that the election was not proper and thus that trump won good or bad?
To me they are bad.
That belief doesn't make them bad.
I just disagree with them.
I believe people are bad for what they do.And there we are. I disagree with you. So we couldn't agree on good and bad.
I believe people are bad for what they do.
You believe they're bad for what they believe?
Some believe wrong things, but do no wrong.No, I believe they are bad for something they do. They say Trump won. They do something.
Some believe wrong things, but do no wrong.
I don't judge them bad.
This applies to both politics & religion.