• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Thou shall not kill!

Ashley Mathura

New Member
One of the Ten Commandants is, Thou shall not kill. Does this apply to animals as well? Should I feel guilty eating meat if animals are regarded as God's precious creations?
 

Sanzbir

Well-Known Member
One of the Ten Commandants is, Thou shall not kill. Does this apply to animals as well? Should I feel guilty eating meat if animals are regarded as God's precious creations?

Considering the book spends a lot of time elaborating which animals are okay to eat and which are not, then no, that commandment in particular should not make you feel guilty for eating meat since meat eating is rather explicitly endorsed later in the book.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
One of the Ten Commandants is, Thou shall not kill. Does this apply to animals as well? Should I feel guilty eating meat if animals are regarded as God's precious creations?

There's no Christian laws against it. So if you feel bad about it, it's for a different reason.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
Humans do murder other animals quite frequently, however.

Sorry, but "murder" is a legal term. not just some liberal buzzword. Murder is determined by the justice system, thus animals cannot be "murdered" because they (thankfully) do not enjoy the rights that are afforded to humans.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
So that we're on the same page, your definition of "murder"?

A bunch of crows?

71911ebe24149dbc3491716fe9b55fe1--not-going-out-crows.jpg
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
So that we're on the same page, your definition of "murder"?

Whenever one organism ends the life of another organism for reasons other than self-defense or food/resources, that's murder. Or, at the very least, senseless killing.

Our poor arachnid friends are especially familiar with this kind of senseless killing. Humans routinely murder these people simply for existing. Pardon... non-animists wouldn't even recognize spiders as persons. I wager the writers of the Bible weren't particularly animistic either, so they would not have intended basic dignity to extend to non-human persons.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
One of the Ten Commandants is, Thou shall not kill. Does this apply to animals as well? Should I feel guilty eating meat if animals are regarded as God's precious creations?
I think the command was dealt to stay the knee jerk killing among ourselves

Man was a creature with a nasty grab what you need or want
and kill anyone that wasn't strong enough to kill you
might makes right

murder would indicate a plot and design.......

killing is just that
grab a rock and hit him upside the head

the spirit of Man would not develop at all, with such behavior in play
it needed to be stopped
 

Rival

se Dex me saut.
Staff member
Premium Member
Whenever one organism ends the life of another organism for reasons other than self-defense or food/resources, that's murder. Or, at the very least, senseless killing.

Our poor arachnid friends are especially familiar with this kind of senseless killing. Humans routinely murder these people simply for existing. Pardon... non-animists wouldn't even recognize spiders as persons. I wager the writers of the Bible weren't particularly animistic either, so they would not have intended basic dignity to extend to non-human persons.
I hate it when people kill spiders. I hate it.
 

DavidFirth

Well-Known Member
God allowed us to kill and eat animals

Genesis 9
3 Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything.

4 “But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it. 5And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each human being, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of another human being.

6 “Whoever sheds human blood,

by humans shall their blood be shed;

for in the image of God

has God made mankind.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Humans do murder other animals quite frequently, however.

So that we're on the same page, your definition of "murder"?

Sorry, but "murder" is a legal term. not just some liberal buzzword. Murder is determined by the justice system, thus animals cannot be "murdered" because they (thankfully) do not enjoy the rights that are afforded to humans.
This is why I find "murder" a difficult word in most conversations. It's vague.

The laws vary a good deal from country to country and different points in time. What people usually mean in casual conversation is more like "killings that I personally disapprove of strongly".

Using it is often an impediment to communications.
Tom
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Sorry, but "murder" is a legal term. not just some liberal buzzword. Murder is determined by the justice system, thus animals cannot be "murdered" because they (thankfully) do not enjoy the rights that are afforded to humans.
Not yet. That's becoming controversial in some quarters.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Sorry, but "murder" is a legal term. not just some liberal buzzword. Murder is determined by the justice system, thus animals cannot be "murdered" because they (thankfully) do not enjoy the rights that are afforded to humans.
The problem I see with this is that it renders the comnandment meaningless: effectively: "prohibited killing is prohibited."

There's a principle of interpretation that says that, generally, we should assume that an author tries to communicate meaning, so interpretations that are either meaningless or redundant should be taken as wrong without a compelling reason to accept them.

Can you reconcile this principle with your interpretation of the commandment?
 
Top