Anyone care to rise to the challenge?.
1
If we came from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?
That's like saying, If the first cattle were brown, why are there still brown cattle now we have other colors? ─ albeit on a larger scale.
2
If evolution is a theory (like creationism) or the Bible why then is evolution taught as fact?
Creationism is based on fundamentalism, the idea that the bible is the infallible word of God, never wrong.
If we treat that as a theory, then it's a completely failed theory. As is easy to demonstrate, the bible is full of errors. One tiny example: it says (repeatedly and only) that the earth is flat.
3
Why have we found only "1 Lucy" when we have found more than 1 of everything else?
We haven't found 'more than one of everything else'. Some fossils like ammonites, are abundant. For some we have only the one fossil. Why shouold hominins from over 3m years ago leave easily found fossils?
I'm also not clear what the question is intended to imply.
4
What mechanism has science discovered that evidences an increase of genetic inf ormation seen in any genetic mutation or evolutionary process?
Alteration of DNA by mistranscription, whether by chemical, radiation or bacterial action or simple accident.
Transposons, genes able to move or copy from one chromosome to another.
Polyploidy, the duplication of a chromosome or a chromosome set.
Certain species of single-celled creatures can exist as individual cells or as parts of a cooperative aggregation of cells.
Some early multicelled creatures appear to have formed by absorption of one cell into another in circumstances where this arrangement was itself duplicated in fission.
Others may have formed when the two cells resulting from fission remained connected after.
5
If the Big Bang Theory is true and taught as science along with evolution, why do the laws of thermodynamics debunk said theories?
Dear oh dear, not that old chestnut! Ilya Prigogine got the Noble Prize in Chemistry back in 1977. His work incidentally debunks the claim in the question.
6
Because science by definition is a theory -not testable, observable, nor repeatable, why do you object to creationism or intelligent design being taught in school?
That's a silly thing to say ─ even hypotheses are testable, the tests observable and so on. So I'd guess this is equivalent to saying, How do you know how the earth and life came into being? ─ God was there and you weren't.
Which leads to dating techniques, cosmological measures of time and distance, and so on.
7
What purpose do you think you are here for if you do not believe in salvation?
My evolved purpose ─ to survive long enough to breed. (Or if I'd chosen not to breed, then I guess whatever made me feel purposeful, which might be the same as saying I was here to work.)
8
How do you explain a sunset if there is no god?
Sunsets are natural phenomena.
The enjoyment of sunsets is a cultural thing. Sunsets occur incidentally in paintings from the start of Western art, say maybe 13th cent on, but they don't become iconic till the 18th century and the Romantics.
9
Is it completely illogical that the earth was created mature? i.e. trees with rings...... Adam created as an adult_______
This is Last Thursdayism, which really goes back to the proposal in Philip Gosse's book
Omphalos (1857) to reconcile fundamentalism with science by suggesting that God had created the world roughly when Ussher said, 4004 BCE, but done it complete with the astronomical and geological history we see now that points to origins at a far more distant time.
It has the advantage of being undisprovable, with the accompanying disadvantage of irrelevance. (In science, it can't be a theory if it can't be falsified.) It has the further disadvantage of making God look like the sneakiest of deceivers.
