[youtube]5CaMUfxVJVQ[/youtube]
YouTube - ‪Wendy's Commercial - Soviet Fashion Show‬‏
YouTube - ‪Wendy's Commercial - Soviet Fashion Show‬‏
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps you should do some grad level research into comparing capitalist running dog porn with PRRC or USSR porn.
Inquiring minds need to know!
You say that only one side is doing it. Then you give emulation as the reason the other side is doing it to. Do you see the contradiction?
Moreover, how do you know who is emulating whom? I'd say you picked a side, & have become its apologist.
Uh huh......I'd suggest a break from the Kool-Aid.
I don't say anything about equal blame....or any blame. Things simply are what they are, & we might be able to discern causative factors.
You may fault me for a desire to see things a certain way, but I suspect that as one who has picked a side, thine own eye has the larger plank.
Reality is a wonderful thing to grok....but all we have is our unreliable perceptions of it. A healthy skepticism of one's one beliefs is useful.
Objectivity is best achieved by minimizing emotion, which is best served by not becoming overly attached to one side or too opposed to the other.
Since Libertarians are feckless, rare & therefore inconsequential, I claim the higher ground above this fray. Of course, I could still be wrong...& often am.
And now we each know the other's.We still must take stances.
No, I don't. And here is why, even if I feel a bit disrespectful by implying that I must explain: the Dems are emulating the shock value tactics of the GOPs, true. But 1) far as I know, they fall short of actually giving power to nutcases - or perhaps you could more properly say that their nutcases aren't so appealing to voters; and 2) more to the point, I have yet to see something comparable to the self-satire of the most visible Republican names coming from the Dems.
right..................Didn't they try this with Larry Flint?
Michele Bachmann pledges to ban pornography if elected president - Minneapolis News - The Blotter
And now we each know the other's.
Normal people often find me inscrutable, but here it is in a nutshell:Do we? In all honesty, I can't say I have figured yours quite clearly yet.
I am half-convinced that it is beyond me, in fact.
Ya! You betcha!Are you equipped to deal with extremes when you find them, however?
Oh, well....I can't impress everyone.On the contrary, that is exactly the issue. I lack any confidence on your skill at recognizing, much less dealing with, true extremes.
It's not that I devalue my own opinions, but rather that I recognize & try to address their limitations.Or to put it another way: you are free to call myself a partisan. I am at least just as free to call it a load, particularly since you don't seem to value your own opinion all that much yourself.
If the social conservatives keep this kind of crap up, they will insure the re-election of the worst and most dangerous president the U.S. has ever had; who rivals the abominable Jimmy Carter and the Dick Nixon. Woe, woe, woe, be to the United States for its foulness shall be great!
right..................Didn't they try this with Larry Flint?
Michele Bachmann pledges to ban pornography if elected president - Minneapolis News - The Blotter
In my opinion T-Dawg, Ronald Reagan, G.H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton are three of the best presidents we've had in a long time. The Clinton years were very prosperous for the U.S., but we also had a balancing factor in those years, the 1990's, which was a majority of republicans in the congress and senate which forced Clinton to gravitate more to the center and more conservative in his policies if he wished to get anything done. Oh gawd, I would take Bill Clinton or even his ill-tempered wife any day of the week over Borak Hussain Obama!