A Jewish Adam who is a hermaphrodite and has both male and female sex organs was not "standard Jewish Doctrine" in earlier time periods and to different Jews.
We've already discussed the Jewish interpretation that created an Adam that was a hermaphrodite, with both male and female organs and the ability to have sex with itself so that it could procreate children without needing a female.
The type of Judaism that created this ungainly and distasteful version of Adam was NOT necessarily even the normative Jewish doctrine since Jewish doctrines differed among the different types and times of jewish history.
1) Jewish apostasy and varying doctrines between it's various schisms.
Apostasy, as a generic historical principle affected the Jews just as it affects all other Abrahamic religions. The Jews apostatized from specific religious principles, and a new prophet in another age attempts to steer them back towards more correct belief system and, based on their ability and willingness, they respond, but only to have this cycle repeat itself again.
Jewish Religious Apostasy – Like Christianity, Judaism, even in the earliest ages, has been characterized by multiple schisms and types and movements characterized by differing beliefs. For example, one can even be atheist and still remain Jewish.
2) Normative jewish beliefs change over time and are different among the different jewish groups
The predominant jewish groups and their influences changes over time and in different places. For example, The biblical Pharisees/rabbinical groups and Sadducees/priestly groups were two influential groups mentioned in the biblical text, yt, after the destruction of the second temple approximately 70 a.d., the Sadducees as a priestly elite, along with their Judaic influence is inconsequential. Judaism, and it’s great influential players evolved and changed just like other religions.
3) Different Jews, having different beliefs created different biblical translations
Thus, it should come as no surprise that the Jewish movements responsible for writing the 3rd century b.c. LXX did not believe the same as the Masoretic writers creating an “official” Jewish bible (tanakh) almost 1000 years later. These two groups of Jews were not the same and differing beliefs are reflected in their translations as well.
Though the Rabbinical leadership may have held to an interpretation that created a hermaphrodite Adam who had both male and female sex organs, the Jews who translated the LXX in 300 b.c. clearly believed that the man Adam was created in the virtual image of God (since he looks like his creator to the extent that he is mistaken FOR his creator by angels).
4) Jewish bibles and other sacred texts varied historically and are incomplete
Keep in mind that it is not merely Jewish religion that undergoes change, evolution and apostasy, but the early Jewish oral traditions tended to vary much more as oral stories and transmission than in later generations when they became written Tanakhs (Hebrew bibles) that could be copied, especially in the later ages of printing. Each step improved stabilization of the text. Even then, until they became standardized by whatever group predominated influentially, multiple textual versions of these oral stories existed.
For example, the Palestinian Talmud tells us that there were three different versions of the Torah in the Temple and that a forth one was made from consensus between the three. They may have varied much more than the simple textual examples in the Talmud reveal to us.
For example, Whiston makes the point that the Jewish Historian Josephus’ was probably using yet another official copy of the Tanakh from the temple which was given to him by Vespasian as a source for his description of Jewish History. Josephus’ history as revealed from the version of the Torah that he was given, varies a great deal historically from later current rabbinic and mishnic texts , as well as from latter “standardized” Hebrew bibles. For example, his version has Moses considering three plans to escape the impending Egyptian armies (parting of the waters, parting of the mountains, flight through the air), rather than simply parting the red sea.
The Dead Sea Scrolls revealed a Hebrew bible text that was almost a millennia older than the prior jewish texts and allowed, in many cases, wonderful corrections to the text. Such corrections and discoveries of missing pieces are profoundly important. Even missing portions of the early Talmud continue being discovered which make modern versions more intelligible.
5) Incompleteness and changes to Jewish texts has been known for millennia.
Just as recent discoveries allow for Jewish correction of missing portions of the Talmud, other continuing discoveries allow for correction of Old Testament Text.
As Justyn Martyr claimed in his Debate with the Jew Trypho, there are Jewish narratives that have changed and some of the lost or corrupted data that would have made the scriptures more clear that Jesus was the very Messiah. (Whether the Jews would have accepted Jesus if such changes had not occurred in their scriptures is another matter). The fact that much of the text is missing has been known for ages and newer discoveries are allowing us to improve biblical text that is both incorrect and / or what is missing from the text.
An example of a lost passage of scripture is from the DSS text of Samuel: The missing paragraph belongs to 1 Samuel 11:1. It presents forty nine words (49) which are missing in the Hebrew Bible as well as in other Jewish texts in this single verse.
With the restoration of this passage, the final verse in Chapter 10 transitions smoothly and with a better understanding as we enter the first verse in chapter 11. With such textual restorations of the Jewish text, the entire context of the story can be put into it’s proper perspective:
Missing text in the Jewish record is NOT a rare occurrence. There are also smaller, but significant additions in verses 11, 13, 18, 22, 23 and 24 IN JUST THE FIRST CHAPTER OF SAMUEL. This is partly the reason the New International Version Bible prefers the DSS textual readings over the traditional hebrew text. They are not the only bible trying to correct corruptions and deletions from the traditional Jewish text. "Today’s English version"; "Revised Standard Version", the "New Revised Standard Version", "The New English Bible", The "New American Bible", etc. are ALL using DSS corrections over the prior traditional Hebrew Text.
It is not just the "few words" that are missing, nor even just stories, but entire BOOKS that are missing from the current Jewish narratives.
The fact that jewish (and christian) texts have errors and are incomplete can account for some errors in theology as well as varying theological positions among different Jewish and Christian movements.
The take away principle is that Judaism has always undergone the same tendency to apostasy and schism in both doctrine and practices that plagued early Christianity and the various versions of the creation of Adam (and many other important base doctrines) reflect the specific interpretation of various groups of Jews who are not the same in belief nor practice as early Jews. Thus, when one claims a specific belief is “Jewish” in orgin or nature, it probably only represents a specific belief that was taught by one group of Jews at a certain time period. The same is true of Jewish doctrinal claims.
The Jewish doctrine that Adam was created as a hermaphrodite with two differing sets of sex organs that may have originated from Jews is no more Jewish than the doctrine that Adam was created in the Image of his creator that may have originated from another group of Jews (and Christians) interpreting the same, or a different text.
Clear
δρακειειω
