Hard to argue with producing what was promised...
If that’s your measure, then he is not nearly as good as Obama was; and Obama faced a Republican legislature irrationally hellbent on blocking every policy he tried to promote, with that as the backbone for their own stated policy of making Obama a one-term president. (remember: that was when they were called “The Party of ‘No’”).
But that is low hanging fruit. There are much more important things regarding national policy.
So. Now then...let everyone here understand, those who oppose Don the Conman don’t ONLY despise his debilitating narcissism and flagrantly pathological lying, which unto themselves have been the source of so many policy blunders, international debacles, and possible (yet to be investigated) high crimes and misdemeanors.....
but
we also object to his terrible policy maneuvers that have only made our formerly great nation weaker, poorer, and more isolated.
If you want to go back and read all of
@james dixon post #27, that is a good start. Make sure you answer his questions.
But, what has been Don the Conman’s “crowning” achievement so far? Yeah. His tax cut bill. The bill that gave his fellow richy-rich elites huge tax cuts, and the rest of us a few bucks in our pockets (last year). The great and wonderful bill that keeps giving his pals in the country clubs tax breaks for time immemorial, while you and I lose in the next 2-3 years. (How’s that for helping the coal miners and middle class working Joes?). Oh, and of course all of you who fawningly gather round your Conman’s legs know that his tax break bill had a particular clause specifically giving bigger breaks for commercial real-estate developers, like.....ooooohh......himself? Not home owners or small rental operators, just the tycoons, and only the tycoons.
Last minute addition to Tax Bill
But of course all of you knew that, because you actually follow the news, yet you all defended him while the election was wrapping up and he refused to disenfranchise himself from his businesses which would be a breach of the emoluments clause in the US Constitution, especially if he used his power as president to financially aid himself.
As I recall, the general sentiment from the right was, “He’s so brilliant, he can run the country and his business at the same time anyway.”
So
@Enoch07 and
@Mindmaster and
@Revoltingest and others..... do you still want to desperately cling to the idea that Don the Conman is NOT an absolute failure inflicted upon the world by the American voters (and the electoral college), by what? By claiming that the lefties are whiners about his “slightly off-kilter” personality, but that he’s a great president who is oh-so-effective in Making America Great Again?
Consider these whiners...