Yeah. So thanks for the ad hominem, but its good that you have read it cover to cover. Honestly, that's great. But if I turn around and tell you that I am not like you where I read it like this and that but you read it with a presupposition that its utter nonsense altogether right from the outset, it is ad hominem. Also I am thinking I am God to know your mind better than you yourself which is practically an egoistic, arrogant position thinking "I know you better than yourself". Maybe I am also making a facade assumption about you because I am a hypocrite, so obviously I maybe thinking you are one just like me to take a book with a load of preexisting biases and premises so its absolutely no point reading it. This is all useless, so I would not do that.
Since you have read the book well
1. Nevertheless, do you think Ayyam as in the verses you quoted is one 24 hour day, while a 1000 days is one day, while also 50000 years is also one day? What do you think?
2. Since you have already said that creation took 6 days but have ignored the explanation of the language in the OP, do you think that six days happened 6,000 years ago?
3. If you think that these six days was actually 6,000 years because a day is a thousand years like some assumed in this thread, when did that 6,000 years end? Is it still continuing? If the Quran says it happened at a particular time, when it is still 1400 years ago, and it speaks of historical figures like Noah which you have claimed was 4,000 years ago (with no evidence of course other than the non-sequitur "Quran doesnt say it is not"), so was this creation prior to that 4000 years? Which would mean at least 10,000 years? What do you say?
4. Why do you think some people like Ibn Haldhun way before Darwin, in the 14th century interpreted verses in the Quran that speaks of the creation of man as evolution of man with words like "sawwaythuhu" in the verse 15:29 as "turning" not "a magical wand type of creation" practically via simple language and propagated evolution of man in his book?