• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Atheism based on superstition?

Kirran

Kirran

ॐ
Premium Member
I would like to say as a general point: paarsurrey, it is not normal use of English to put 'Please' at the end of every sentence, to refer to people as 'one' or to put 'Regards' in every post.
 
Rival

Rival

se Dex me saut.
Staff member
Premium Member
Kirran said:
I would like to say as a general point: paarsurrey, it is not normal use of English to put 'Please' at the end of every sentence, to refer to people as 'one' or to put 'Regards' in every post.
Click to expand...
Actually I use 'one', but the other two, no.
 
LuisDantas

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
paarsurrey said:
I don't get one exactly. Please illustrate one's point for me.
Regards
Click to expand...
In other words: we met in so many threads and I got to know your way of thinking to my satisfaction.

And yet, you keep surprising me with your viewpoints.
 
Willamena

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
paarsurrey said:
Is philosophy 100% accurate? I don't think so. Please
Regards
Click to expand...
Accurate in what way? If I expose that knowledge is greater than true belief, wherein does accuracy lie? If you believe the arguments as I do, then you may be convinced, but if you have good counter-arguments you may be convinced of something else. Analysis makes no claims of accuracy, except where it may analyse accuracy.
 
paarsurrey

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Willamena said:
Accurate in what way? If I expose that knowledge is greater than true belief, wherein does accuracy lie? If you believe the arguments as I do, then you may be convinced, but if you have good counter-arguments you may be convinced of something else. Analysis makes no claims of accuracy, except where it may analyse accuracy.
Click to expand...
Philosophy is working of the human mind. To err is human, hence philosophy is not 100% accurate.Right? Please
Regards
 
paarsurrey

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Jaiket said:
ThIse basis is in finding religious claims regarding gods to be incredible. We might be wrong, but that isn't superstition in itself.
Click to expand...
One sense of superstition is "unreasonable notion", just to critique religions while not to critique Atheism on the same basis is unreasonable and inequitable.It makes Atheism an irrational belief/unbelief.
Is it not superstition or the like?
Regards
 
Kirran

Kirran

ॐ
Premium Member
paarsurrey said:
One sense of superstition is "unreasonable notion", just to critique religions while not to critique Atheism on the same basis is unreasonable and inequitable.It makes Atheism an irrational belief/unbelief.
Is it not superstition or the like?
Regards
Click to expand...

Atheism is just a lack of theism. It's not an explicit belief.
 
SkepticX

SkepticX

Member
Suggesting atheism is based upon superstition is like claiming the rules and standards of not collecting stamps are too convoluted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top