Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think you are forgetting that many of those stars and galaxies people see from their telescopes took millions or billions of years to reach earth. Even light takes a long time to travel over astronomical distance. If there are other life like our in other parts of the universe and in precisely the stage of technological development, then their signals would probably not reach us for centuries or even milleniums.wanderer said:Since we have found no evidence that intelligent life exists elsewhere, we can assume at least that is must be a rare occurence, as over billions of years intelligent signals or aliens themselves should have been encountered, and evidence left behind.
We may, of course, assume any number of things, but I suspect that it amounts to little more than the arrogant presumption that we are inevitable.wanderer085 said:Since we exist, we may assume intelligent life to be common, ...
Permit me a guess: you're not an engineer.lamplighter said:Also the reason we don't pick up signals of other civilations is simply due to incompatable technologies, you certainly don't use your a FM radio to hunt down a Wi-Fi connection do you?
If you were to go back in time 600 years and take 20 men, put them on a huge island and then tell them to go seek out other humans (note the men are together) they would start looking for humans the way they expect to find them. In an hour fly a plane overhead, then go and ask them if they saw any humans... I bet they would say no.The premise here is that over billions of years, if intelligent life capable of space travel is common, then some evidence of it would inevitably be picked up by someone looking for it, (such as with radio telescopes), or alien visits of the past would have left behind some traces. Since no evidence of such has been found, we can assume at least the intelligent life has not been COMMON in our galaxy over the life of our galaxy.
It would be a bad assumption... Make an assumption on probablility based on 1 case? I could flip a coin and see it land heads... Now using this one case, from your logic, I can assume heads is going to show more than tails... It is a wrong assumption, but it is an assumption.Since we exist, we may assume intelligent life to be common
I doubt it mentions them, since the cosmology was different back then: planets were not chunks of rock orbiting stars; stars were not the centres of solar systems; and gods did not make planets and stars --they were them.Genna said:Does the bible, quran or any other religion make them mention of Intelligent life on other planets? Why would God make the universe which is filled with billions of galaxies, each galaxy containing at least hundreds of billions of stars. Perhaps there are intelligent life on other planets pondering the same philosophical questions as we?
cardero said:There are two things we must consider as well.
1) That any intelligent life could have been on earth tens of thousands of years before humankind.
2) That with their sophisticated technology they may have discovered ways to travel faster than any theories that we have proposed about space travel.
Both of these examples would require a humble attitude of our sciences and position in this universe.
Considering possibilities is not "making it up as you go along." The existance of life beyond Earth does not threaten a belief in God at all.sandy whitelinger said:Since you are making it up as you go along why not just say God was here first then?
HopefulNikki said:Considering possibilities is not "making it up as you go along."
HopefulNikki said:The existance of life beyond Earth does not threaten a belief in God at all.
You get them from your mind, by observing the things around you...if that consitutes "making stuff up" to you, virtually every thought we've ever had constitutes "making stuff up," does it not? Yet I would consider much of that creativity, ingenuity, etc...you make it sound like a negative.sandy whitelinger said:Where do you get the possibilities from then if you aren't making them up?
Who said they did? Are you making that up?For example why do these ET's have to have technology to get arond?
Nope, #post 131.HopefulNikki said:Who said they did? Are you making that up?
Yes, that's one possibility...they may have advanced technology, they may not. There's no reason to assume that they do, however.sandy whitelinger said:Nope, #post 131.