Mr Spinkles
Mr
Let's suppose I'm sick and tired of insisting on evidence all the time. Forget evidence! I'd rather just have faith. :162:
Now, normally, the evidence would lead me to conclude "I have no idea if there is one god, or four; or if god thinks killing cows is wrong; or if the gods want me to worship idols of them, or if there is one god who forbids it; or if there is one eternal afterlife, or if we are reincarnated after each life." However, let's say I've decided that I'm now willing to beleive in religious doctrine X even if it has no better evidence to support it than religious doctrine Y.
So...what should I have faith in? If there is no evidence for Thor, YHWH, Jehova, Brahman, Zeus, Allah, etc., how do I pick which one is correct? If evidence is no longer important, doesn't my decision become arbitrary, and probably result more from my upbringing/what I'm exposed to in society than from how "true" the religion is?
Now, normally, the evidence would lead me to conclude "I have no idea if there is one god, or four; or if god thinks killing cows is wrong; or if the gods want me to worship idols of them, or if there is one god who forbids it; or if there is one eternal afterlife, or if we are reincarnated after each life." However, let's say I've decided that I'm now willing to beleive in religious doctrine X even if it has no better evidence to support it than religious doctrine Y.
So...what should I have faith in? If there is no evidence for Thor, YHWH, Jehova, Brahman, Zeus, Allah, etc., how do I pick which one is correct? If evidence is no longer important, doesn't my decision become arbitrary, and probably result more from my upbringing/what I'm exposed to in society than from how "true" the religion is?