wellwisher
Well-Known Member
Most of the shootings in the USA occur in Democrat run cities where gun laws are very strict, where there is an active black market and now a revolving door justice system. Chicago, alone, had over 1000 deaths by shooting last year. Nationally, we would need 50-100 times as many mass shootings, by the end of the year, to catch up to one city, who has strict gun laws.
Mass shootings account for less total killings, but these receive the most media and press coverage. Something is not quite right in terms of the press reporting things a proportional way to the degree of problem. Something else is being pushed and something worse is being glossed over. What is up with that?
Those who wish to strict control guns laws, are practicing what they preach in places like Chicago. They should be pointing out all the tangible successes of why their sales pitch is the best strategy for the problem. But this strategy has not led to level of success as sold by the sales pitch. The data is swept under the rug by various sympathizing media outlets, who demonstrated they are more than willing to lie about things like Russian Collusion hoax.
I used to be a development engineer. When you develop new ideas, you first test the concept in the lab to make sure it works. If this small scale test shows promise, you then scale the concept and run pilot tests before scaling up into full production.
The pilot test is an opportunity to work out bugs under more realistic instead of ideal conditions, before you before full scale. Chicago and other large cities have been good pilot tests of the gun taboo. It is not working out as well as the sales pitch and the lab data, which is why this level of failure is not being reported by the same people who pitched the idea. They want to ignore the pilot data and go into scale up, with no accountability if things go as bad as the big city pilot tests. How about accessories to murder?
If the approach of science was important, the politicians would analyze the pilot data data and look for a new approach; back to the drawing board. This approach should not go into into production and turn the entire country into a Chicago style Wild West town. Who benefits by skipping steps leading to disaster?
In schools, one political party, after a few lab tests in the 1970's, suggested that we deal with sex, unwanted pregnancy and STD's by teaching sex education in schools, even at a young age. Why not teach gun safety in schools? If proactive teaching of safe practices does not make the problem worse for sex, why not use that approach for guns? Why the hypocrisy?
If this approach works, as stated, for one behavior it should work for both. But if it makes a problem worse, this would also happen in both cases. This hypocrisy is what happens when you skip pilot testing, gloss over bad results, and scale up things even of made worse.
One oldest lessons in the bible is prohibition will create temptation. Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, only after they were told not to do that. Atheism is school has made this lesson of human nature less conscious. Name me one taboo that has not led to a black market expansion and an underground to drive demand. This happened in Chicago.
Mass shootings account for less total killings, but these receive the most media and press coverage. Something is not quite right in terms of the press reporting things a proportional way to the degree of problem. Something else is being pushed and something worse is being glossed over. What is up with that?
Those who wish to strict control guns laws, are practicing what they preach in places like Chicago. They should be pointing out all the tangible successes of why their sales pitch is the best strategy for the problem. But this strategy has not led to level of success as sold by the sales pitch. The data is swept under the rug by various sympathizing media outlets, who demonstrated they are more than willing to lie about things like Russian Collusion hoax.
I used to be a development engineer. When you develop new ideas, you first test the concept in the lab to make sure it works. If this small scale test shows promise, you then scale the concept and run pilot tests before scaling up into full production.
The pilot test is an opportunity to work out bugs under more realistic instead of ideal conditions, before you before full scale. Chicago and other large cities have been good pilot tests of the gun taboo. It is not working out as well as the sales pitch and the lab data, which is why this level of failure is not being reported by the same people who pitched the idea. They want to ignore the pilot data and go into scale up, with no accountability if things go as bad as the big city pilot tests. How about accessories to murder?
If the approach of science was important, the politicians would analyze the pilot data data and look for a new approach; back to the drawing board. This approach should not go into into production and turn the entire country into a Chicago style Wild West town. Who benefits by skipping steps leading to disaster?
In schools, one political party, after a few lab tests in the 1970's, suggested that we deal with sex, unwanted pregnancy and STD's by teaching sex education in schools, even at a young age. Why not teach gun safety in schools? If proactive teaching of safe practices does not make the problem worse for sex, why not use that approach for guns? Why the hypocrisy?
If this approach works, as stated, for one behavior it should work for both. But if it makes a problem worse, this would also happen in both cases. This hypocrisy is what happens when you skip pilot testing, gloss over bad results, and scale up things even of made worse.
One oldest lessons in the bible is prohibition will create temptation. Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, only after they were told not to do that. Atheism is school has made this lesson of human nature less conscious. Name me one taboo that has not led to a black market expansion and an underground to drive demand. This happened in Chicago.
