Let's take a serious look at the facts presented by the article vice your condemnation of the source because you don't like what they have to say.
Now be forewarned, I am going to use some language and tactics that Democrats, especially far left Democrats like to use.
Ready?
Here goes
What we have here are two members of the NYC City Council, along with fifteen other members that are supporters of terrorist, either by their stupidity ( typical for your coastal Democrats) or trying to make a name for themselves. This is typical of the we-no-nothing about what we are talking about but we are smarter than everyone else Democrats
Fact: The council’s Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology Act would require the NYPD to issue reports on what kinds of spy equipment police use — such as license-plate readers, cellphone trackers and X-ray vans used to peer through walls — as well how the department stores and protects private information collected.
Fact: Fifteen members of the City Council are co-signers of the bill
Fact: One of the writers of the bill said they were willing to revise the bill with more input from the NYPD.
Fact: Mayor de Blasio believes the legislation is a non-starter, according to spokesman Austin Finan.
Now this shows the stupidity of those that wrote the bill. They didn't have the brains to go to the NYPD and ask for input before writing the bill. But after being told they are basically **** -for-brains they backtracked.
Now I will revert back to the kindly old gentleman that I am.
Now
@tytlyf please explain why you do not accept the article, other than you have nothing else to do. There are no opinions expressed by the author of the article, they only reported what was said by other parties. Seems that you have a problem with accepting facts that you don't like.