Renji
Well-Known Member
So don`t you start saying that theories are not important because they are not facts or laws... They are much more than that.
No, I'm not saying that they're not important. Please review my posts.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So don`t you start saying that theories are not important because they are not facts or laws... They are much more than that.
I'm curious about something, Lawrence. How do you explain the paleontological evidence?
I'm curious about something, Lawrence. How do you explain the paleontological evidence?
I go to the root of it...the creator of the theory, Charles Darwin.
Often to understand someone's agenda, you have to look at who the person is associated with. Who was Darwin associated with? (freemasons)
Can't help thinking that it's a bit of a hidden agenda. Also the family experiments by Darwin suggest something more sinister and although I can't cover it enough over here...the basic point is that his theory was all about eugenics and population control.
You did not answer the question, Lawrence.Paleontological evidences can be associated with "dating the tree of life" with the help of fossil dating.I'm curious about something, Lawrence. How do you explain the paleontological evidence?
You did not answer the question, Lawrence.
I go to the root of it...the creator of the theory, Charles Darwin.
Often to understand someone's agenda, you have to look at who the person is associated with. Who was Darwin associated with? (freemasons)
Can't help thinking that it's a bit of a hidden agenda. Also the family experiments by Darwin suggest something more sinister and although I can't cover it enough over here...the basic point is that his theory was all about eugenics and population control.
Fair enough. Thank you.I'm conducting study on paleontological evidences. However, my knowledge about this thing is not that wide( and I don't want to give an opinion on it that can lead to an error). I'm afraid I cannot give you a specific answer this time. I'm working on it.
Not quite. Paleontology has made a number of testable predictions that have proven to be true.As far as I know, paleotology is a "historical science" it tries to explain causes rather than conduct experiments to observe effects.
I'm conducting study on paleontological evidences. However, my knowledge about this thing is not that wide( and I don't want to give an opinion on it that can lead to an error). I'm afraid I cannot give you a specific answer this time. I'm working on it.
Please don't fall the stupid argument that fossils are (to quote Lewis Black) the handiwork of the Devil. YouTube - Lewis Black - The Devil's Handiwork
Topic on last post: Paleontological Evidences
Related to: Fossils
Fossils related to: The Handiwork of the Devil??
I go to the root of it...the creator of the theory, Charles Darwin.
Often to understand someone's agenda, you have to look at who the person is associated with. Who was Darwin associated with? (freemasons)
Can't help thinking that it's a bit of a hidden agenda. Also the family experiments by Darwin suggest something more sinister and although I can't cover it enough over here...the basic point is that his theory was all about eugenics and population control.
But Isaac Newton was also a freemason! That means The Theory of Gravity is also some nefarious scheme to further the diabolical Illuminati's new world order!!
Do find it to be worth believing and why?
yeah, with 250 years of evidence its amazing that scientist would ever be sure of any natural phenomena.haha scientists. what cracks me up is how sure they are of complete evolution. in my bio textbooks...i constantly run by the phrase "because of/as a result of evolution...."