And the LORD opened the mouth of the donkey, and she said unto Balaam
Hypothetical: there is some truth to be found:
So, the Lord opened the mouth of the donkey is claimed. Normally a donkey is perfectly capable to open her own mouth. So this part might be symbolism. It could have been 'Donkey opened mouth and God spoke through her to Balaam'. But it's not.
Balaam said unto the donkey, Because thou hast mocked me
Here Balaam claims donkey mocked him.
Can donkeys mock humans?
1)If not, did Balaam go crazy? If so, should we take the part' God opened mouth' serious?
2)If yes, how did donkey mock?
Did donkey mock verbal? Or draw a Balaam cartoon or even did donkey do
The puzzle to solve is 'donkey:To speak or not to speak'. So for simplicity I assume mocking was also verbal.
1)If verbal, was it also God? Or could Balaam hear donkey always? If it was God, it should be written in Bible (mothers always record first words). If it is not in Bible then it was not God. So, then it was Balaam able to hear voice donkey all along. But then it makes no sense to say 'God opened mouth of donkey' to start with
I tried open mouth of my cat. Boy oh boy, she did not like that. She told me "don't do that ever again or I bite you; I can do it myself" (okay last part I made up)
And the donkey said unto Balaam, Am I not thy donkey, upon which thou hast ridden from thy youth unto this day? Was I ever in the habit of doing this to you? And he said, No.
Donkey seems quite chatty, or was it the chatty mind of Balaam?
Donkey debated well, because Balaam admitted straight away "No". No counter argument at all. Normally on RF people hate to admit when wrong, and keep mouth shut, hoping others forget quick. Not Balaam. He admits. So outsmarted by donkey.
That must be proof enough it's all true. Normal people don't admit. But admit losing debate from donkey is huge. Then it must be true, or he lost it completely
Anyway. The final 'No' is a bit strange. Balaam accuses donkey for mocking him. Donkey said "was I ever in habit doing this". Balaam said "No".
So that means it was only in his mind (mocking part).
But then "God opening mouth donkey" might as well been only in his mind.
Maybe I should have read more context, but I was not in the mood.
I could believe animals can "talk" if God exist and is omnipotent. But this story does not seem coherent.