Are you sure you have those words in the right order?Own your do-do
Are some words missing?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are you sure you have those words in the right order?Own your do-do
I don't disagree."Dictionaries are only for providing commonly used definitions. They cannot prove political & economic claims."
What does this have to do with legally mandated minimum wages in a capitalist market societies?Even collectives can set wages for some at less
than it takes to thrive, eg, N Korea.
You argued that socialist countries wouldn't need min wages.What does this have to do with legally mandated minimum wages in a capitalist market societies?
No, I didn't. I argued that legal minimum wages are a policy that only makes sense under capitalism.You argued that socialist countries wouldn't need min wages.
And I explained my disagreement.
Sorry your business doesn't deserve to force people to starve or take your breadcrumbs. Middle finger to anyone who is upset at minimum wage increase or worker aid programs.
Yes, I know. You're wrong IMO, but that's okay.And I explained my disagreement.
Liberty for the rich, unfairness that benefits the minority with means under the delusion that they 'deserve it,' peace for the rich to protect them from the exploited, all things typical for someone who can't see outside their relatively tiny bubble, or muster up basic human empathy.Liberty, tolerance, prosperity, fairness, peace....all
things that threaten so many here.
I'm thinking much more broadly than dost thee.Liberty for the rich....
Even I woudn't want to meet her in a dark alley.Ayn Rand was a hateful crone and now she's dead (died in lonely poverty on the welfare she demonized). And nobody aught to mourn her.
I believe Walmart receives $6+ Billion in corporate welfare every year. This isn't available to mom and pop small businesses.What subsidies & tax breaks do you have in mind?
Oh, dear...I see the fundamental problem between us.Yes, I know. You're wrong IMO, but that's okay.
I'm not familiar with the specific "corporate welfare program".I believe Walmart receives $6+ Billion in corporate welfare every year. This isn't available to mom and pop small businesses.
The reason these subsidies are available to Walmart is because Republicans are bought and paid for by corporate entities.
I'm not familiar with the corporate welfare program.
But I do generally oppose financial subsidy.
For example, some local governments will try to attract
a new factory by offering property tax abatements.
I oppose that. It's ripe for corruption, & it's unfair.
Do you favor or oppose it?
I'm a fan of the basics, ie, one system for all.They've tried stuff like that here, while only achieving mixed results. There's competition between cities, and some cities are able to offer a better deal. But there are others who argue that a better way to attract more business is to stick to the basics, such as a good education system and a decent infrastructure. If you neglect the things that count, then it doesn't matter what perks are offered.
But she's still better than the icons of socialism.
I don't think you know what those words mean.It's either a false dilemma or a needless detour. But there you go again.
I don't think you know what those words mean.
I think it depends on the proposed plan and the net benefit to the community. Sure it can lead to corruption because that's the problem with money. I think you have to look at it on a case-by-case basisI'm not familiar with the specific "corporate welfare program".
But I do generally oppose financial subsidy.
For example, some local governments will try to attract
a new factory by offering property tax abatements.
I oppose that. It's ripe for corruption, & it's unfair.
Do you favor or oppose it?
And yet, you're constantly giving off the appearance that people with a different take than yours, using different definitions or asserting different beliefs, must be either lying, malicious, or simply too dense to understand your self-evidently correct opinions, while I'm convinced that even rational, well-meaning people can be wrong sometimes.Oh, dear...I see the fundamental problem between us.
You have "The Truth".
I have only opinions.