Sculelos
Active Member
Actually, the universe is made of quarks. Go lower and you get strings. There are four forces (that we know of), and only one is electromagnetism.
Quarks do have low levels of Electromagnetism and thus are made with a combination of Electrons and Neutrons. Quarks give off radiation which is the effect of Electromagnetic fields colliding with each other.
Electrons and Neutrons can be any size, bigger then the universe and smaller then the Quark.
For people who didn't want to read this whole thread here is a rehash of all important information lined up in a row.
As you believe. However I believe them to be genuine.
If however they are not we still have a LOT of PROOF that Giants did exist.
http://www.6000years.org/giants.html
32 foot tall skeleton « The s8intcom Blogger
Proof that a cover up was involved and the original skeleton was genuine.
Everyone's replying the giant was faked and national geographic (The Smithsonian) said it was the mammoth on the left that was found, yet their 'Official' photo's show obvious signs of doctoring were as the low resolution photo probably taken from someone's cheap camera unofficially as some people have actually claimed that they destroyed the evidence for this as National Geographic is obviously pro-evolution and they wouldn't want something so troubling upsetting the masses now would they?
1. The ground is smoothed over in the Mammoth photo... this isn't possible in a recent dig unless they refilled their hole.
2. Some of the imprints from the giant are still in the Mammoth photo (shocking huh)
3. The groundpost in the mammoth photo simply have their shadows going the wrong way (big mistake from their photo editor)
[youtube]P5jXVStAYPU[/youtube]
"GIANT" Skeletons Discovered...2013 - YouTube
That video is interesting. I'm not sure what to thing of the Mastadon dig site except I'm 100% certain the Cornwell university doctored their "Official" pictures, and that indeed the "Fake" picture looks very, very genuine. (and the official dig was done supposedly in India in 1997, not in Hyde Park!(possibly staged cover-up?)).
Anyways here's another photo.
Does the forehead look right to you?
Here's an picture that detects for obvious alteration, I can clearly see airbrushing and insertion on the middle and right photo's, airbrushing almost always shows up on magazine models, but not usually on fossils.
Some actually are in museums right now, but up to now it's just been thumb bones, femurs, skulls, vertebrae, footprints and even a 12 foot tall mummified man but not any whole skeleton that has been 36 foot tall.
(Look at this link http://www.6000years.org/giants.html)
I believe that if any remains of such giants are still intact that they would be exceedingly rare and that if indeed one whole skeleton was found especially by The National Geographic aka the "Smithsonian Institute of Science and Technology" they wouldn't hesitate to destroy it.
Even if you believe that some of my photos were faked. The evidence of many giant footprints would lead you to believe that humans up to 36 feet tall existed. Unless that is of course that you don't want to believe.
Look at the Moon landings for example, we have overwhelming evidence that they are true yet many deny their truth as once I did, yet once I really started examining the moon landings I found anomalies but that was only because of what I expected the Moon to act like based on what Science had told me it acted like, yet the Moon Physics were troubling by the fact it they in and of themselves prove Newtonian Gravity to be a sham, however I have since replaced them with Quantum Physics and you know what? It just works. And yes the Moon acts exactly like slowed down Earth physics with the surface acting like a thin layer of snow. Less Attraction (gravity) simply makes everything move slower and more freely and has no impact on height or weight or force oddly enough.
Now bringing my post back to Giants, if a single Giant 36 feet tall exist. It automatically disproves an Old Earth and Evolution and the Big Bang all at the same time. This is because for it to be so the Universe must have been at one point in time about 10,000 smaller in total volume then it is today. The exact Dimensions of the Earth would have been 384 miles wide by 256 miles tall and no Oceans would exist (Rivers Yes). Which is a 1.5:1 Ratio compared to Today's 2:1 Ratio of width to height.
It would mean that our universe is in it's last stages before the magnetic fields holding the universe apart fails and our universe collapses on itself though... in less then 115 years from now...
Edit: I will say our eye-sight currently has a field of vision of 16:9 based on all test. Converting to a 1 ratio that makes it 1:1.7777777777777777777777777777778.
It is said in the ancient scrolls when the universe finally fades the final crunch will happen when the 1:8 ratio is complete yet it was created in a 1:5 ratio and yet it currently is 98.76% complete with only 1.24% remaining till the big crunch happens and we pop like a balloon that has expanded too far, my Machine has predicted that date to happen anywhere from 72-115 years from now with the actual date being the "Year of the Mystery".
Question: Whats the Universe made of?
Answer: Ions and Neutrons
Question: What are Ions and Neutrons?
Answer: Ions are Electrons with an Electro-Magnetic Charge! Neutrons are Electrons with no Electro-Magnetic charge.
Comment: Wowzers!!! who would of thought that the elements in the universe strip down to these two things!
Last edited: