-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Behold the Nephilim
- Thread starter Sculelos
- Start date
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
Confirmed fakes
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
I should also have you know this is relatively old news and has been spread across the internet for years.
It is so obvious that Christian fundamentalist do not use these pictures to prove the Bible
:biglaugh:
It is so obvious that Christian fundamentalist do not use these pictures to prove the Bible
:biglaugh:
Sculelos
Active Member
As you believe. However I believe them to be genuine.
If however they are not we still have a LOT of PROOF that Giants did exist.
http://www.6000years.org/giants.html
32 foot tall skeleton « The s8intcom Blogger
Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
Hehe...hehe...hehe.
Original untouched photos of the "Giant Human," a mastodon.
Aerial Views of Hyde Park Dig Site
Aerial Views of Hyde Park Dig Site
Sculelos
Active Member
Cornell University was hired to create a similar photo-op and mask the real event.
It's unconfirmed why but I would not put anything past the Deceptive power of Satan.
How can you tell... the spinal prints are still in the sand as well as the head marks, yet the bones they replaced them with are obvious fakes to mask the real event. The real bones were destroyed.
How f'ed up is that whole situation when we purposely destroy evidence...
Last edited:
Good grief. 
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
Am I the only one that is seriously finding this thread funny and wants it in the "Games / Pics / Jokes / Stories" section?
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
Proof that a cover up was involved and the original skeleton was genuine.
The original photo is shot in a clear 720 resolution almost while the fake has been reduced to mask the editing.
The lower resolution is always the fake. I do photo editing 24/7 and for all you know I could have been the one to edit it
Sculelos
Active Member
The original photo is shot in a clear 720 resolution almost while the fake has been reduced to mask the editing.
The lower resolution is always the fake. I do photo editing 24/7 and for all you know I could have been the one to edit it
Your eye's deceive you. The shadows are simply going in the wrong way in the first and also the sand has been artificially smoothed over, plus imprints from the first crappy genuine picture remain.
I'm 100% certain that the high resolution photo is fake and I can't find a single flaw with the low resolution photo.
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
I am a photographic editor. I would to post some of my perverted pictures on RF if I could.
But you can look at the resolution and tell it has been lowered. This is not a debate as anyone can clearly see how grainy it is. You can tell from the bordering that a different texture of earth is implement from the surrounding while int he original photo they are the same.
A nice smooth mud while in the Skeletor picture there is smooth mud then a layer of harsh rock.
That makes no geographic sense.
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
Sculelos
Active Member
I used to dig dirt and make all sorts of dirt pits all the time and I know that recently dug up dirt is rough while filled in dirt is smooth, just saying that the first picture has significant evidence of them refilling in part of the hole that was dug out in the low quality photo.
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
You should look up these things before you post.
Try this instead:
This is a very different issue then the Giant of Castelnau
Shermana
Heretic
Cancel that, this is a fake. I need to follow my own advice!
Sha'irullah
رسول الآلهة
There have been a few giant primates in the past that are related to us indirectly but no giant Homo Sapiens.
