Trailblazer
Veteran Member
That is because I am logical. Just because religion required different methods to prove it is true that does not mean that religion is all just bunk. It would be illogical to expect scientific methods to prove religion is true because science cannot study the supernatural, only the natural.Special pleading. You claim religion must use different methods to prove it is true, yet you fail to see an alternative solution - that religion is just all bunk.
No religious beliefs can be verified to be false but that does not mean that no religious beliefs are true. That can be checked by anyone but not everyone will get the same results because religion is not science.Please, give me an example of such a thing. I bet you have to resort to some wishy washy "I verified it in a way that can't be checked by anyone else" excuse.
I have no premises or conclusions because I have no logical argument. Since beliefs about God and Messengers of God can never be proven true or false they are not subject to logical arguments.Okay then. You're still stuck with a premise that you can't prove, and since your entire argument depends on that premise being true, the fact you can't prove it leaves your whole position rather shaky.
I never said that it proves that God exists, I said that Baha'u'llah provided evidence. Evidence is not proof.No it does not prove that God exists.
By carrying out His agenda items 1-3, Baha'u'llah provided evidence that:
(a) He was a Messenger of God, and
(b) God exists.
A real God has to exist in order to have a real Messenger of God who represents Him.God does not need to exist in order for someone to represent him. Lots of people have claimed their religion is Jedi because they want to represent the ideals of the Jedi, but that doesn't mean the Force is real.
Put another way, if a real Messenger of God exists that means a real God has to exist.