Hi, bro and sis! I am struggling with rejections of my very logical Articles, for example, the proof of Riemann Hypothesis, abc conjecture, Dark Matter, angels, Holy Spirit. I have questions:
Compare scientific skepticism and ordinary skepticism. And how does this all differ from banal...
It seems like Science is of a female character. Scientific journals are as illogical and emotional as dates with a woman are. Females in my family are illogical and emotional most of the time. And it makes them good people. I like not the cold-blooded logic but the love.
Not every good...
"For there is no acceptance of faces with God" Romans 2:11.
I have submitted the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis to the top journal Math. Immediately I received a rejection letter. Then I sent the proof of the ABC hypothesis to Math. I have been waiting for an answer for a month, and I am...
Perhaps you have seen Ben Stein's "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed", there is shown the war between Creationism and Evolution.
Let me find the reason for this war.
1. Science does not deal with God, this is the definition of the word Science: Scientists follow closely the methods of...
If something can not be disproven, it is a huge plus, it is a positive circumstance. How such a positive fact would take away the scientific status? I bet that 2+2 is 4 can not be disproven, or General Relativity can not be disproven. Is it bad for them? God can not be disproven.
So, it should...
It is demonstrated that the many world interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is a useless, unpractical idea. The many world interpretation was aimed to make the path from one universe to another a deterministic process. But that goal was not achieved: modern experiments have proven that quantum...
Who is the best person ever? Who is worst?
If one is better than the other, then there is the best and worst of all beings.
The best we will call God, the worst - the devil.
An Atheist would comment: "Well, according to this logic, Keanu Reeves will be God, and the devil will be some...
Thus, on the one hand, there is no MOND and Dark Matter, because gravity and light propagate at the same speed; but on the other hand, there is MOND and no Dark Matter, because of the new observational results.
Therefore, there is a logical contradiction in nature. This, means, that we...
Authors: Dmitri Martila
The motion in a Black Hole spacetime is studied. Several new results are found, in particular about the nature of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. The energy aspect of a matter in curved spacetime is explained. It is understandable why underground detectors for particles of...
My proof: Файл из Облака Mail.ru
It was submitted to viXra and rejected! Is it good, that viXra.org became just another arXiv.org?
Same merciless restrictions and unofficial peer-review. Look, the rejection letter:
Your submission cannot be processed because it is not written scholarly in that...
The incompleteness theorem of Kurt Gödel (re-proven in the link below),
tells me that there are questions in Science and mathematics which
have no solution, but have an answer.
Only God knows what is the answer: for example,
to the Riemann Hypothesis (is it true or false,
no third option)...
1. Visible non-living matter: water, air, stones, pencil, TV, PC, IA, etc.
2. Invisible non-living matter: Dark Matter, Dark Energy.
3. Visible living matter: bears, birds, cats, dogs, etc.
4. Invisible living matter: souls, angels.
“The most beautiful things in the world cannot...
Despite the observational proof of the Spagettification by Black Holes in 2020 AD, I am arguing, that this observational fact has wrong interpretation, because "The important things in life you cannot see with your eyes" (fairytale "The Little Prince").
An author is not obligated to check for the validity of all the papers, which he refers to.
Otherwise, he would be checking all references of the papers he references, i.e.
to check for the validity of all papers, which lead to his paper. And to do it using personal...
Comments on videos:
1. The scary and creepy thing: yes, it is. Evolution is the direct consequence of methodological naturalism: ground making way of doing science. Thus, it is science. However, Creationism is true. True to the Existent God.
Evolutionism is Science, but that does not make it...
There are many scientists, who believe in God.
But the methodological naturalism is the basic rule of their profession.
Does methodological naturalism strengthens and benefits their faith?
Can a believer assume for an hour that there is no God, and not lose faith?
Naturalism (philosophy) -...
MY IDEA FOR MAKING NATURAL THEOLOGY:
The Absolute Truth, e.g. 2+2=4, can not be false. So, the falsifiability criterion is unscientific.
A nihilist can say: "the Absolute Truth is only in mathematics, not in physics nor elsewhere."
I am replying, that the humankind...
The Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder has seriously studied the Flat Earth idea and found, that it is wrong, but not unscientific. Thus, soon it will be correct and scientific. When is your estimate when there peer-review papers of Flat-Earth will start?
More about problems of peer-review:
My SSRN paper and its discussion are here:
Top science problems solved in top e-journal
A reviewer might write:
"But, let's take a very brief look at your work from your abstract in SSRN:
That's interesting. You state that "they will never find" is a "testable prediction".
How is that a...
I was the client of viXra for many long years, but now after 2-month review, my results on top problems (including the Dark Matter and Dark Energy and violation of energy-momentum conservation) is published in a reputable academic place:
Social Science Research...